Literature DB >> 3742798

Correct and incorrect estimation of within-day and between-day variation.

M J Bookbinder, K J Panosian.   

Abstract

Between-day variance is an ambiguous term representing either total variance or pure between-day variance. In either case, it is often incorrectly calculated even though analysis of variance (ANOVA) and other excellent methods of estimation are available. We used statistical theory to predict the magnitude of error expected from using several intuitive approaches to estimation of variance components. We also evaluated the impact of estimating the total population variance instead of pure between-day variance and the impact of using biased estimators. We found that estimates of variance components could be systematically biased by several hundred percent. On the basis of these results, we make recommendations to remove these biases and to standardize precision estimates.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3742798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Quantification of alachlor in water by a novel magnetic particle-based ELISA.

Authors:  T S Lawruk; C S Hottenstein; D P Herzog; F M Rubio
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Direct detection of influenza virus antigen in nasopharyngeal specimens by direct enzyme immunoassay in comparison with quantitating virus shedding.

Authors:  G Döller; W Schuy; K Y Tjhen; B Stekeler; H J Gerth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications.

Authors:  Ake Norberg; A Wayne Jones; Robert G Hahn; Johan L Gabrielsson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Quantification of 2,4-D and related chlorophenoxy herbicides by a magnetic particle-based ELISA.

Authors:  T S Lawruk; C S Hottenstein; J R Fleeker; J C Hall; D P Herzog; F M Rubio
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Validation of a paramagnetic particle-based ELISA for the quantitative determination of carbaryl in water.

Authors:  J A Itak; E G Olson; J R Fleeker; D P Herzog
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.151

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.