Stromal-epithelial interactions and heterogeneity of proliferative activity within the prostate.

Growth and functional activity within the prostate gland is known to be regulated by androgens whose effects are thought to be mediated via androgen receptors. This concept has been derived in large part through analysis of whole organ homogenates, an approach which ignores potential heterogeneity of biological activity within the gland and the importance of cell-cell interactions. In this review recent findings are summarized which demonstrate that growth of the prostatic ductal network during prepubertal periods, as well as during prostatic regeneration in androgen-treated adult castrates, is nonuniform, with ductal growth being highest at the ductal tips and much lower in proximal ducts closer to the urethra. Androgen dependency for maintenance of ductal architecture following castration follows a similar pattern in that castration results in total destruction of distal ductal architecture, while proximal ducts are maintained albeit in an atrophic state. Thus, striking differences in biological properties are found in distal versus proximal prostatic ducts. Morphogenesis, growth, and secretory cytodifferentiation within the developing prostate is elicited by androgens which act via mesenchymal-epithelial interactions. Through analysis of chimeric prostates constructed with androgen-receptor-positive wild-type mesenchyme and androgen-receptor-negative Tfm (testicular feminization) bladder epithelium, it is now evident that androgenic effects can be elicited in androgen-receptor-deficient (androgen-insensitive) Tfm prostatic epithelium, provided that the connective tissue component of the chimeric prostate is wild type. This observation has been made for both the developing and adult prostate. From this data it is evident that certain androgenic effects (ductal morphogenesis, epithelial growth, and secretory cytodifferentiation) do not require the presence of intraepithelial androgen receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)