Literature DB >> 3741599

Differential effects of cholinergic blockade on performance of rats in the water tank navigation task and in a radial water maze.

O Buresová, J J Bolhuis, J Bures.   

Abstract

The disruptive effect of cholinergic blockade was tested under conditions in which either the working memory or the spatial mapping requirements of the behavioral task were emphasized. In Experiment 1, 13 rats were trained in an eight-arm radial water maze to asymptotic performance. When delays of 5, 10, 20, and 40 min were inserted between Choice 4 and Choice 5, incidence of errors in Choices 5-8 increased after pretrial (20 min) scopolamine injection (0.2 mg/kg, ip) faster than under control conditions and approached chance level with the 40-min delay. Scopolamine after Choice 4 or pretrial methylscopolamine was ineffective. In Experiment 2, 30 rats were trained in a Morris water tank. Acquisition was impaired by pretrial injection (20 min) of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg scopolamine, but a higher dose (1.0 mg/kg) was required to impair overtrained performance. In a working memory version of the navigation task, scopolamine administered 20 min before the first trial deteriorated retention tested 40 min later at a dose of 1.0 but not at 0.4 and 0.2 mg/kg. It is concluded that the disruptive effect of scopolamine is proportional to the demands on the working memory component of the task whereas the use of an overtrained mapping strategy is relatively resistant to cholinergic blockade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3741599     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.4.476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  22 in total

1.  Hippocampal neurotransmitter efflux during one-trial novel object recognition in rats.

Authors:  Emily M Stanley; Marlene A Wilson; Jim R Fadel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Neuromodulation by glutamate and acetylcholine can change circuit dynamics by regulating the relative influence of afferent input and excitatory feedback.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.590

3.  Neuromodulation of I(h) in layer II medial entorhinal cortex stellate cells: a voltage-clamp study.

Authors:  James G Heys; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Chlordiazepoxide reduces discriminability but not rate of forgetting in delayed conditional discrimination.

Authors:  S Tan; R C Kirk; W C Abraham; N McNaughton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Chronic treatments with cholinoceptor drugs influence spatial learning in rats.

Authors:  F A Abdulla; M R Calaminici; J D Stephenson; J D Sinden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Delay-dependent working memory impairment in young-adult and aged 5-HT1BKO mice as assessed in a radial-arm water maze.

Authors:  Mathieu Wolff; Narimane Benhassine; Pierre Costet; Rene Hen; Louis Segu; Marie-Christine Buhot
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Cognitive performance in neurokinin 3 receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  R E Nordquist; M Delenclos; T M Ballard; H Savignac; M Pauly-Evers; L Ozmen; W Spooren
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  A model of episodic memory: mental time travel along encoded trajectories using grid cells.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Effect of age on cognitive sequelae following early life seizures in rats.

Authors:  Havisha B Karnam; Qian Zhao; Tatiana Shatskikh; Gregory L Holmes
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.045

10.  Experience-dependent, rapid structural changes in hippocampal pyramidal cell spines.

Authors:  Takuma Kitanishi; Yuji Ikegaya; Norio Matsuki; Maki K Yamada
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.