Literature DB >> 3738836

Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. I. General solutions for structured populations.

S A Frank.   

Abstract

Models of sex-ratio evolution in structured populations are derived with G.R. Price's covariance form for the hierarchical analysis of natural selection (1970, Nature 227, 520-521). Previous work on competition among related males for mates (local mate competition), competition among related females for a limiting resource (local resource competition), inbreeding, group selection, and asymmetry of genetic inheritance between males and females, are subsumed under a general formulation for sex-ratio biases in structured populations. I found that the evolutionarily stable strategy sex ratio (males:females) for diploids is 1 - rho m:1 - rho f, where rho m is the regression coefficient of relatedness of the controlling genotypes on males competing for mates, rho f is the regression of controlling genotypes on females that compete for a fixed, limiting resource, and there is no inbreeding. For inbreeding and no competition among females, the evolutionarily stable strategy is 1 - rho m:1 + rho mf, where rho mf is the regression of controlling genotypes on females' mates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3738836     DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(86)90013-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  22 in total

1.  Inbreeding and parasite sex ratios.

Authors:  Sean Nee; Stuart A West; Andrew F Read
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Antibiotics cause parthenogenetic Trichogramma (Hymenoptera/Trichogrammatidae) to revert to sex.

Authors:  R Stouthamer; R F Luck; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sex ratio evolution through group selection using diffusion approximation.

Authors:  Josiane Courteau; Sabin Lessard
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 2.259

4.  Group selection versus group adaptation.

Authors:  Andy Gardner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection.

Authors:  Arne Traulsen; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Adaptation and the evolution of parasite virulence in a connected world.

Authors:  Geoff Wild; Andy Gardner; Stuart A West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The evolution of society.

Authors:  T Clutton-Brock; S West; F Ratnieks; R Foley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour.

Authors:  P D Taylor
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

9.  A general model of the public goods dilemma.

Authors:  Steven A Frank
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Information constraints and the precision of adaptation: sex ratio manipulation in wasps.

Authors:  David M Shuker; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.