Literature DB >> 3734441

Recolonization and colonization resistance of the large bowel after three methods of preoperative preparation of the gastrointestinal tract for elective colorectal surgery.

A E van den Bogaard, W F Weidema, C P van Boven, D van der Waay.   

Abstract

The impact of three current types of preoperative large bowel preparation on the microbial flora and the colonization resistance (CR) was investigated in 15 volunteers. In the first group a whole gut irrigation was performed without administration of antibiotics (group WGI). In the second group 0.5 g/l metronidazole and 1 g/l neomycin was added to the irrigation fluid (group WGI + AB). A whole gut irrigation with prior oral administration of 1 l mannitol 10% was performed in the third group. The antibiotic prophylaxis in this group consisted of two doses of 80 mg gentamicin i.v. and 500 mg metronidazole orally 24 h after lavage (group Mann + AB). One hour after the mechanical cleansing procedure was finished all volunteers were orally contaminated with one dose of an Escherichia coli test strain. The aerobic faecal reduction due to the cleansing procedure was 2-3 logs, while for the anaerobes it was 4-5 logs. The anaerobic flora in group WGI recovered within 24 h, while the aerobes showed a transient 'overgrowth' for the period of 2 days. The overgrowth of aerobes in group WGI + AB was observed for more than a week and the total numbers of aerobes started gradually to decline after the anaerobic flora had reached pretreatment levels at day three or four. Despite the normal numbers of anaerobes present 24 h after treatment, overgrowth of E. coli was seen in the group Mann + AB, probably due to residual mannitol left in the intestinal tract. The test strain of E. coli was excreted for a period of 1 week by the volunteers in the groups WGI and Mann + AB, but it was isolated for more than 10 weeks in the group WGI + AB. It is thought that all three methods of preoperative large bowel preparation decreased the CR of the gastrointestinal tract because of a disturbance of the interaction between aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms and alterations of the colonic wall. The anaerobic microflora, however, appeared to be primarily responsible for the maintenance of the CR. Antimicrobial prophylaxis should consist of a high dose, short term, systemic antibiotic regimen, not only because an adequate serum level of an appropriate drug at the time of operation substantially decreases the incidence of postoperative septic complications but also because a systemic regimen scarcely influences the CR of the gastrointestinal tract. beta-Aspartylglycine appeared to be a specific but not very sensitive marker for decreased CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3734441      PMCID: PMC2082873          DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400064342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)        ISSN: 0022-1724


  19 in total

1.  Drug-induced malabsorption.

Authors:  G F Longstreth; A D Newcomer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Efficacy of preoperative antimicrobial preparation of the bowel.

Authors:  R L Nichols; R E Condon; S L Gorbach; L M Nyhus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Whole-gut irrigation in preparation for large-bowel surgery.

Authors:  J Hewitt; J Reeve; J Rigby; A G Cox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The intestinal flora of colonization-resistant mice.

Authors:  F Wensinck; J G Ruseler-van Embden
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1971-09

5.  The relative significance of preoperative oral antibiotics, mechanical bowel preparation, and preoperative peritoneal contamination in the avoidance of sepsis after radical surgery for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease of the large bowel.

Authors:  K Barker; N G Graham; M C Mason; F T De Dombal; J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Intestinal antisepsis. Stability of fecal flora during mechanical cleansing.

Authors:  G H Bornside; I Cohn
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Anaerobes in mixed infections.

Authors:  K McGowan; S L Gorbach
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional and antibiotic-treated mice.

Authors:  D van der Waaij; J M Berghuis-de Vries
Journal:  J Hyg (Lond)       Date:  1971-09

9.  Quantitative gas chromatographic analysis of volatile fatty acids in spent culture media and body fluids.

Authors:  A E van den Bogaard; M J Hazen; C P Van Boven
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Alterations in human intestinal microflora during experimental diarrhoea.

Authors:  S L Gorbach; G Neale; R Levitan; G W Hepner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  4 in total

1.  Enterobacteriaceae suppression by three different oral doses of polymyxin E in human volunteers.

Authors:  J J van Saene; H K van Saene; N J Tarko-Smit; G J Beukeveld
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  The human microbiome and surgical disease.

Authors:  Michael J Morowitz; Trissa Babrowski; Erica M Carlisle; Andrea Olivas; Kathleen S Romanowski; John B Seal; Donald C Liu; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  The opposing forces of the intestinal microbiome and the emerging pathobiome.

Authors:  Jennifer Defazio; Irma D Fleming; Baddr Shakhsheer; Olga Zaborina; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Comparative analysis of the fecal bacterial community of five harbor seals (Phoca vitulina).

Authors:  Daniela Numberger; Daniel P R Herlemann; Klaus Jürgens; Guido Dehnhardt; Heide Schulz-Vogt
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.139

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.