Literature DB >> 3733739

Heterogeneity and structure of brain tubulins from cold-adapted Antarctic fishes. Comparison to brain tubulins from a temperate fish and a mammal.

H W Detrich, S A Overton.   

Abstract

Tubulins purified from brain tissue of Antarctic fishes assemble in vitro to form microtubules at the low temperatures experienced by these extreme psychrophiles (Williams, R. C., Jr., Correia, J. J., and DeVries, A. L. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 2790-2798). We have initiated studies to determine the structural requirements for assembly of Antarctic fish tubulins at low temperatures. As a first step we have compared the heterogeneity, structures, amino acid compositions, and net charge of brain tubulins purified from three Antarctic fishes (Notothenia gibberifrons, Notothenia coriiceps neglecta, and Chaenocephalus aceratus), from the temperate channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), and from a mammal (the cow). Each preparation contained the alpha- and beta-tubulins and was free of microtubule-associated proteins. When examined by isoelectric focusing and by two-dimensional electrophoresis, brain tubulins from the Antarctic fishes were found to be highly heterogeneous; each was resolved into approximately 20 isoelectric variants. The distributions of the isotubulins from the cold-adapted fishes were similar but differed significantly from those of tubulins from catfish and cow. The average isoelectric points of the alpha- and beta-tubulins from the Antarctic fishes were more basic than the isoelectric points of the corresponding tubulins from bovine brain. Peptide mapping confirmed that tubulins from the Antarctic fishes and the mammal differed in structure. The amino acid compositions of fish and mammalian tubulins were similar, but Antarctic fish tubulins apparently contained fewer Glx residues than did catfish or bovine tubulins. Finally, native tubulins from an Antarctic fish and the cow differed slightly in net negative charge. Thus, brain tubulins from the cold-adapted fishes differ structurally from the tubulins of a temperate fish and of a mammal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3733739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  5 in total

1.  Single centrosome manipulation reveals its electric charge and associated dynamic structure.

Authors:  S Hormeño; B Ibarra; F J Chichón; K Habermann; B M H Lange; J M Valpuesta; J L Carrascosa; J R Arias-Gonzalez
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Genomic remnants of alpha-globin genes in the hemoglobinless antarctic icefishes.

Authors:  E Cocca; M Ratnayake-Lecamwasam; S K Parker; L Camardella; M Ciaramella; G di Prisco; H W Detrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Methods in tubulin proteomics.

Authors:  Leah M Miller; Hui Xiao; Berta Burd; Susan Band Horwitz; Ruth Hogue Angeletti; Pascal Verdier-Pinard
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.441

Review 4.  Reconstituting Microtubules: A Decades-Long Effort From Building Block Identification to the Generation of Recombinant α/β-Tubulin.

Authors:  Shih-Chieh Ti
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Dipole-dipole interactions in microtubules.

Authors:  Jacques E Schoutens
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.