Literature DB >> 3730337

A comparison between the organization of obstetrics in Denmark and The Netherlands.

S Scherjon.   

Abstract

A comparison was made between two types of obstetric organization: total hospitalization as in Denmark, and a system that allows a choice between hospital and home delivery, provided there are no medical contra-indications, as in The Netherlands. Until the end of the 1950s, the current Dutch view prevailed in Denmark; Denmark changed its organization in the late 1960s and followed the international preference for total hospitalization. This change was not caused by disappointing obstetric results, nor was it the result of strong pressure from pregnant women. The change was associated with a considerable increase in instrumental deliveries. In both countries the perinatal mortality rate decreased continuously but in Denmark the improvement in early neonatal mortality was slightly faster. This difference may have occurred because of insufficient referral in The Netherlands of high-risk pregnancies and deliveries to the fully equipped obstetric departments. The Dutch acceptance of a high proportion of home-confinements is unlikely to be the explanation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3730337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  4 in total

1.  Analysis of 275 planned and 10 unplanned home births.

Authors:  G Schneider; B Soderstrom
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Increased obstetric activity: a new meaning to "induced labour"?

Authors:  S Vallgårda
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Assessment of social psychological determinants of satisfaction with childbirth in a cross-national perspective.

Authors:  Wendy Christiaens; Piet Bracke
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Towards a better understanding of risk selection in maternal and newborn care: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Bahareh Goodarzi; Annika Walker; Lianne Holten; Linda Schoonmade; Pim Teunissen; François Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.