Literature DB >> 3728777

Prophylactic knee bracing in college football.

G F Hewson, R A Mendini, J B Wang.   

Abstract

American football can be harmful to knees. In an attempt to reduce the number and severity of knee injuries, the intercollegiate football team at the University of Arizona (Pacific Ten Conference) has been using protective braces since 1981. Objective evaluation of the effectiveness of this program is the purpose of this study. All linemen, offensive and defensive, as well as linebackers and tight ends were considered to be the players at greatest risk and were required to use the braces. The brace used was the Anderson Knee Stabler. Each player at each practice session or game was counted as one exposure. During the 4 years of brace use, there were 28,191 exposures, while the control group numbered 29,293 exposures. The data were analyzed from the perspectives of days lost from practice or games, player's position, the type and severity of injury, and the rate of injury per 100 players per season. Players at risk showed no trend to change in injury rate. Of the players at risk, the type and severity of injury in nonbraced and in braced groups were similar. A significant finding in players at risk was a two-fold increase in knee ligament injury rate per 100 players when compared to rates for an entire team. The number of season-ending injuries remained unchanged. Practice time missed for third-degree medial ligament, and for medial meniscus injuries, was significantly lower in the braced group, but this was due to improved treatment techniques initiated in 1981. Seven NCAA rule changes, directed at reducing knee injuries, have been introduced since 1981.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3728777     DOI: 10.1177/036354658601400403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  17 in total

1.  Effect of prophylactic knee bracing on balance and joint position sense.

Authors:  T W Kaminski; D H Perrin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  The effects of prophylactic knee bracing on running gait.

Authors:  C L Liggett; R D Tandy; J C Young
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Muscular and functional performance characteristics of individuals wearing prophylactic knee braces.

Authors:  P A Borsa; S M Lephart; F H Fu
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  The Effects of Prophylactic Brace Construction Materials on the Reactive Responses of the MCL During Repetitive Impacts.

Authors:  P E Patterson; J Eason
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Common American football injuries.

Authors:  J A Saal
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  A systematic review of prophylactic braces in the prevention of knee ligament injuries in collegiate football players.

Authors:  Brian G Pietrosimone; Terry L Grindstaff; Shelley W Linens; Elizabeth Uczekaj; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Evaluation of knee braces in Swedish ice hockey players.

Authors:  Y Tegner; R Lorentzon
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes.

Authors:  B Reider
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  [American football injuries in the German Federal League: risk of injuries and pattern of injuries].

Authors:  A W Baltzer; P D Ghadamgahi
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1998-04

Review 10.  New developments in osteoarthritis. Prevention of injury-related knee osteoarthritis: opportunities for the primary and secondary prevention of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Charles R Ratzlaff; Matthew H Liang
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.