Literature DB >> 3726727

Classification and management of postsurgical anal stenosis.

J W Milsom, W P Mazier.   

Abstract

Postoperative anal stenosis is a serious complication of anal operations. To date, ideal management of this problem has not been well defined. We reviewed the experience with this entity in 212 patients admitted over a five year period to a hospital specializing in colonic and rectal diseases. Etiology of the stenosis was secondary to hemorrhoid operations in 186 patients (87.7 per cent), anorectal surgical procedures associated with Crohn's disease in seven (3.3 per cent) and multiple other causes in the remaining 19 (9.0 per cent). A treatment plan based upon the cause, severity and level of stenosis of the anal canal (lower, middle and upper part of the canal) is proposed. Anal stenosis associated with Crohn's disease was treated with dilation with the patient under anesthesia with good results in six of seven patients. Severe lower anal canal stenosis was best treated by V-Y anoplasty (18 of 20 patients [90 per cent] with good results), although a simple sphincterotomy or multiple anal sphincterotomies achieved a good result in 75 of 111 patients (67 per cent). The middle, upper and entire anal canal stenoses were treated effectively by single or multiple internal anal sphincterotomies (34 of 42 patients [83 per cent] with good results), although advancement flap anoplasty procedures (simple advancement flap and V-Y anoplasty) worked well when indicated (nine of ten patients with good results). We advocate simple or multiple internal anal sphincterotomies for mild to moderate low anal stenoses, V-Y anoplasty for severe low anal stenoses and initial simple or multiple anal sphincterotomies through the stenotic area for middle, high or entire anal canal stenoses. Surgical judgement will dictate when lack of anoderm mandates advancement flap anoplasty with the sphincterotomy for the higher stenoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3726727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  12 in total

1.  Rectal stenosis after procedures for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH)--a report from China.

Authors:  Liqin Yao; Yunshi Zhong; Jianmin Xu; Meidong Xu; Pinghong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical treatment of anal stenosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brisinda; Serafino Vanella; Federica Cadeddu; Gaia Marniga; Pasquale Mazzeo; Francesco Brandara; Giorgio Maria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Complications Following Anorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Hiroko Kunitake; Vitaliy Poylin
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-03

4.  Rhomboid-shaped advancement flap anoplasty to treat anal stenosis.

Authors:  J A H Sloane; A Zahid; C J Young
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Anastomotic stricture after ultralow anterior resection or intersphincteric resection for very low-lying rectal cancer.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  House advancement flap anoplasty for severe post-hemorrhoidectomy anal stenosis.

Authors:  T Acar; N Acar; F Tosun; Ç Ayaroğlu; M Haciyanli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Anoplasty for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Low Anal Stenosis: A New Technique.

Authors:  Sami Asfar
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Surgical excision of extensive anal condylomata not associated with risk of anal stenosis.

Authors:  Daniel Klaristenfeld; Shlomi Israelit; Robert W Beart; Glenn Ault; Andreas M Kaiser
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Early rectal stenosis following stapled rectal mucosectomy for hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Gunter Hellmich; Dietrich Schumann; Anja Schuster; Klaus Ludwig
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Comparison of Effects of Vessel-Sealing Devices and Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Murat Kendirci; İbrahim Tayfun Şahiner; Yeliz Şahiner; Güven Güney
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.