Literature DB >> 3725009

MRI in acoustic neuroma: a review of 35 patients.

W L Curati, M Graif, D P Kingsley, T King, C L Scholtz, R E Steiner.   

Abstract

This retrospective study is aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of MRI in relation to contrast enhanced CT and air-CT-cisternography. MRI examinations were performed in 35 patients with suspected neurosensorial damage and suggestive of acoustic neuroma: 27 presented on MRI with unilateral tumors, 3 patients had a bilateral tumor and 5 patients were negative on all imaging modalities. The total number of acoustic neuromas detected was therefore 33. To date microscopic analysis has been performed on 12 tumors and histological data based on type Antoni A and Antoni B classification is available. Contrast enhanced CT detected 19 tumors, yielding an overall sensitivity rate of 58%. Air-CT cisternography identified an additional 5 tumors with a sensitivity rate of 100%. MRI identified 33 acoustic neuromas in 30 patients and was negative in 5 patients (sensitivity and accuracy 100%). Considering sensitivity in relation to location, MRI was much better than contrast enhanced CT for internal auditory canal (IAC) tumors (100% versus 36%) and better for cerebello-pontine angle tumors (CPA) tumors (100% versus 68%). The evolution of MRI technique, the various pulse sequences used and their actual selection is discussed. Seven patients received a paramagnetic contrast agent (Gadolinium-DTPA) with the additional benefit of a better demonstration of the tumor. The results suggest that MRI is the best non invasive technique for demonstrating acoustic neuromas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3725009     DOI: 10.1007/bf00548194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  12 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the internal auditory canal.

Authors:  D L Daniels; R Herfkins; P R Koehler; S J Millen; K A Shaffer; A L Williams; V M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Revised guidance on acceptable limits of exposure during nuclear magnetic resonance clinical imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Frequency dependence of magnetic resonance spin-lattice relaxation of protons in biological materials.

Authors:  G D Fullerton; I L Cameron; V A Ord
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Arachnoiditis simulating acoustic neuroma on air-CT cisternography.

Authors:  E F Downey; D R Buck; J W Ray
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Acute deafness.

Authors:  A W Morrison
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1978-03

6.  An evaluation of current diagnostic radiologic modalities in the investigation of acoustic neurilemmomas.

Authors:  P J Dubois; B P Drayer; W O Bank; Z L Deeb; A E Rosenbaum
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Gadolinium-DTPA as a contrast agent in MRI: initial clinical experience in 20 patients.

Authors:  D H Carr; J Brown; G M Bydder; R E Steiner; H J Weinmann; U Speck; A S Hall; I R Young
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  The role of NMR imaging in the diagnosis and management of acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  I R Young; G M Bydder; A S Hall; R E Steiner; B S Worthington; R C Hawkes; G N Holland; W S Moore
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1983 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  MR imaging of the acoustic nerves and small acoustic neuromas at 0.6 T: prospective study.

Authors:  P F New; T B Bachow; G L Wismer; B R Rosen; T J Brady
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Acoustic neuromas: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  D P Kingsley; G B Brooks; A W Leung; M A Johnson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  8 in total

1.  MR cisternography of the cerebello-pontine angle and internal auditory canal in diagnosis of intracanalicular acoustic neuroma.

Authors:  P Bassi; P Piazza; F Cusmano; R Menozzi; A Gandolfi; C Zini
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of multiple spinal neurofibromata-neurofibromatosis.

Authors:  T T Lewis; D P Kingsley
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Medical imaging.

Authors:  L Kreel
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Cystic versus solid vestibular schwannomas: a series of 80 grade III-IV patients.

Authors:  Franco Benech; Rosa Perez; Marco Maria Fontanella; Bruno Morra; Roberto Albera; Alessandro Ducati
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 5.  The Management and Imaging of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  E P Lin; B T Crane
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  CT and MRI of haemorrhage into intracranial neuromas.

Authors:  S Asari; S Katayama; T Itoh; S Tsuchida; T Ohmoto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  [18F]FDG Positron emission tomography with whole body magnetic resonance imaging ([18F]FDG-PET/MRI) as a diagnosis tool in Schwannomatosis.

Authors:  I Gallais Sérézal; S Ferkal; L Lerman; S Mulé; B Funalot; P Wolkenstein
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.123

8.  Prediction of blood supply in vestibular schwannomas using radiomics machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Dixiang Song; Yixuan Zhai; Xiaogang Tao; Chao Zhao; Minkai Wang; Xinting Wei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.