Literature DB >> 3723428

Responses of crayfish photoreceptor cells following intense light adaptation.

D R Cummins, T H Goldsmith.   

Abstract

After intense orange adapting exposures that convert 80% of the rhodopsin in the eye to metarhodopsin, rhabdoms become covered with accessory pigment and appear to lose some microvillar order. Only after a delay of hours or even days is the metarhodopsin replaced by rhodopsin (Cronin and Goldsmith 1984). After 24 h of dark adaptation, when there has been little recovery of visual pigment, the photoreceptor cells have normal resting potentials and input resistances, and the reversal potential of the light response is 10-15 mV (inside positive), unchanged from controls. The log V vs log I curve is shifted about 0.6 log units to the right on the energy axis, quantitatively consistent with the decrease in the probability of quantum catch expected from the lowered concentration of rhodopsin in the rhabdoms. Furthermore, at 24 h the photoreceptors exhibit a broader spectral sensitivity than controls, which is also expected from accumulations of metarhodopsin in the rhabdoms. In three other respects, however, the transduction process appears to be light adapted: The voltage responses are more phasic than those of control photoreceptors. The relatively larger effect (compared to controls) of low extracellular Ca++ (1 mmol/l EGTA) in potentiating the photoresponses suggests that the photoreceptors may have elevated levels of free cytoplasmic Ca++. The saturating depolarization is only about 30% as large as the maximal receptor potentials of contralateral, dark controls, and by that measure the log V-log I curve is shifted downward by 0.54 log units.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3723428     DOI: 10.1007/bf00614518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  19 in total

1.  Signals from cones.

Authors:  M Alpern; W A Rushton; S Torii
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Saturation of the response to light in Limulus ventral photoreceptor.

Authors:  J E Brown; J A Coles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Quantum efficiency and photosensitivity of the rhodopsin equilibrium metarhodopsin conversion in crayfish photoreceptors.

Authors:  T W Cronin; T H Goldsmith
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.421

4.  Visual adaptation in monkey cones: recordings of late receptor potentials.

Authors:  R M Boynton; D N Whitten
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-12-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The attenuation of rod signals by backgrounds.

Authors:  M Alpern; W A Rushton; S Torii
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  NEURAL AND PHOTOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF VISUAL ADAPTATION IN THE RAT.

Authors:  J E DOWLING
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Light-induced changes of sensitivity in Limulus ventral photoreceptors.

Authors:  J E Lisman; J E Brown
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  Dark regeneration of rhodopsin in crayfish photoreceptors.

Authors:  T W Cronin; T H Goldsmith
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Adaptation in the ventral eye of Limulus is functionally independent of the photochemical cycle, membrane potential, and membrane resistance.

Authors:  A Fein; R D DeVoe
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Spectral sensitivity of larval mosquito ocelli.

Authors:  E B Seldin; R H White; P K Brown
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.