Literature DB >> 372226

Comparison of the API 20E and Oxi/Ferm systems in identification of nonfermentative and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria.

T R Oberhofer.   

Abstract

The API 20E and Oxi/Ferm systems were tested in parallel to identify nonfermentative bacteria and oxidase-positive fermentative bacteria. Test strains consisted of consecutive clinical isolates, with stock cultures used to supplement those species infrequently recovered. The two microsystems, as well as tubes of triple sugar iron, motility, cetrimide, and oxidative glucose media, were inoculated by each worker for each organism. Identification of each isolate was by the protocol of the manufacturers, with supplemental tests and flagella stains performed when necessary. Concurrent identification was undertaken with a conventional system against which the results of the two systems were compared for accuracy. There was a 95.3% accuracy in identification by the Oxi-Ferm system and 88.9% by the API system. Almost one-fourth of all identification attempts with the API required computer assistance, and most of these were for oxidase positive bacteria. Because of this, and because the API system showed greater accuracy in identification of the oxidase-negative bacteria, it seems best suited for identification of these organisms (P. maltophilia, A. anitratus, and A. lwoffi). The Oxi/Ferm system is technically less cumbersome than the API and is well suited for both groups of organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 372226      PMCID: PMC272995          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.9.2.220-226.1979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the oxi/ferm tube system with selected Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  T R Oberhofer; J W Rowen; G F Cunningham; J W Higbee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of two test-kits--API and Oxi Ferm tube--for identification of oxidative-fermentative Gram-negative rods.

Authors:  C E Nord; B Wretlind; A Dahlbäck
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1977-07-18       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Evaluation of two rapid methods for identification of commonly encountered nonfermenting or oxidase-positive, Gram-negative rods.

Authors:  H Dowda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of a system approach to the recognition of nonfermentative or oxidase-producing gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; J Sampson-Scherer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Characterization of saccharolytic nonfermentative bacteria associated with man.

Authors:  M J Pickett; M M Pedersen
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Characterization and identification of gram-negative, nonfermentative bacteria.

Authors:  T R Oberhofer; J W Rowen; G F Cunningham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total
  19 in total

1.  Use of the API rapid NFT system for identifying nonfermentative and fermentative marine bacteria.

Authors:  T S Breschel; F L Singleton
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Identity and behavior of xylem-residing bacteria in rough lemon roots of Florida citrus trees.

Authors:  J M Gardner; A W Feldman; R M Zablotowicz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Nonfermentative bacilli: evaluation of three systems for identification.

Authors:  L A Otto; U Blachman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of rapid NFT and API 20E with conventional methods for identification of gram-negative nonfermentative bacilli from pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.

Authors:  M J Palmieri; S L Carito; R F Meyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Comparison of the Quantum II Bacterial Identification System and the AutoMicrobic System for the identification of gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M J Bale; K R Schulte; F P Koontz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Critical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system gram-negative identification card for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative rods.

Authors:  J J Plorde; J A Gates; L G Carlson; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of the MicroScan Urinary Combo Panel and API 20E system for identification of glucose-nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical veterinary materials.

Authors:  J J Mathewson; R B Simpson; F L Brooks
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Accuracy of a rapid carbohydrate oxidation microtube method for identification of nonfermentative gram-negative bacilli.

Authors:  S M Qadri; D L Carr; R Narayanan; J Ottman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of four rapid methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures.

Authors:  P J Malloy; M J Ducate; P C Schreckenberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of Rapid NFT system and conventional methods for identification of nonsaccharolytic gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  R Martin; F Siavoshi; D L McDougal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.