Literature DB >> 3721993

Academic misconduct: results of faculty and undergraduate student surveys.

E B Stern, L Havlicek.   

Abstract

Educators in health-related fields are particularly sensitive to academic misconduct because undergraduate students who falsify academic work in such fields can go on to endanger the health and well being of the very people they are meant to assist. This paper presents the results of a survey of 104 faculty and 314 undergraduate students regarding their experience with academic misconduct. Faculty and student definitions of misconduct are compared, the incidence of cheating within each category is reported, and the projected efficacy of methods for controlling misconduct are examined. Major findings include the following: faculty and students differed significantly in their definitions of 24 of the 36 described behaviors, 82% of the surveyed undergraduate students admitted to engaging in some form of academic misconduct during their college careers, few differences in cheating patterns were related to year in school (class) or gender, and faculty and students differed on the impact that changes in environment and procedure were expected to have on cheating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3721993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allied Health        ISSN: 0090-7421


  2 in total

1.  Academic Dishonesty among Physical Therapy Students: A Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Eli Montuno; Alex Davidson; Karen Iwasaki; Susan Jones; Jay Martin; Dina Brooks; Barbara E Gibson; Brenda Mori
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Motivations and Predictors of Cheating in Pharmacy School.

Authors:  Eric J Ip; Kathy Nguyen; Bijal M Shah; Shadi Doroudgar; Monica K Bidwal
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.