Literature DB >> 3720304

Contraception with the cervical cap: effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction.

M G Powell, B J Mears, R B Deber, D Ferguson.   

Abstract

With the growing interest in barrier contraceptive methods, the cervical cap has come back into use in North America. We examined the cap's effectiveness, safety, continuity of use, and user satisfaction among 617 women who were fitted at a family planning clinic in Toronto, Canada, between May 1981 and November 1983. Follow-up information was available for 516 of these women. Using a life table analysis with Bayesian adjustment, the probability of becoming pregnant after 12 months of use was 0.166 with a standard error of 0.022. There is evidence that after 1 year of use the caps deteriorate and that this deterioration may increase the risk of pregnancy. Many of the women in this study were very satisfied with the cervical cap; however, such problems as dislodgement, discomfort to user and partner, difficulty with insertion and removal, and unpleasant odour affected acceptability and continuity of use. It is likely that these problems could be alleviated by improving the quality of or changing the materials, modifying the design to improve the fit, and providing a greater range of sizes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Americas; Barrier Methods; Canada; Cervical Cap--side effects; Contraception; Contraception Continuation; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Effectiveness; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Data Analysis; Data Collection; Demographic Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Evaluation; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Fertility; Life Table Method; Measurement; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Pearl's Formula; Physical Examinations And Diagnoses; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Qualitative Evaluation; Reproductive Behavior; Research Methodology; Use-effectiveness; Vaginal Barrier Methods--side effects

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3720304     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(86)90015-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  3 in total

1.  Context of Acceptability of Topical Microbicides: Sexual Relationships.

Authors:  Helen P Koo; Cynthia Woodsong; Barbara T Dalberth; Meera Viswanathan; Ashley Simons-Rudolph
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  2005-03

2.  Towards BirthAlert--A Clinical Device Intended for Early Preterm Birth Detection.

Authors:  Mozziyar Etemadi; Philip Chung; J Alex Heller; Jonathan A Liu; Larry Rand; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception.

Authors:  M F Gallo; D A Grimes; K F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.