Literature DB >> 3717170

An epidemiological study of work with video screens and pregnancy outcome: II. A case-control study.

A Ericson, B Källén.   

Abstract

A case-control study on work with video screen equipment during pregnancy has been made for three cohorts of women, identified with the aid of occupational codes in the census, linked to the Medical Birth Registry and a registry containing information on women hospitalized for spontaneous abortion. Five hundred and twenty-two cases were selected (women with spontaneous abortions or women who had infants that died, had severe malformations, or had a birth-weight below 1,500 g) and 1,032 controls (women who had infants without any of these characteristics) taken from the same age stratum as the cases. All pregnancies had occurred in 1980-81. Questionnaires were mailed to the women asking for information on their work situation, including questions about work with video screen equipment. Fifty-eight women were excluded for various reasons. Response rate was 93%--lower (89%) among women with spontaneous abortions than among women who gave birth (95%). As stress and smoking were associated with video screen work, the effect of video screen work was analyzed after stratification for stress and smoking--no statistically significant effect of video screen work was seen but odds ratios were above 1. Crude odds ratios for video screen work were significantly elevated and showed a dose-dependent effect. This finding is discussed from the point of view of biases in the study: selective non-responding, recall bias, geographical variability, and lack of information on women who had induced abortions. Using questionnaire data for exposure rates in the populations studied, an estimate of the effect greater than or equal to 10 hr weekly work with video screens on spontaneous abortion rate was made. The point estimate was 1.04 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.9-1.2. Analysis of 44 infants with birth defects whose mothers had worked more than 10 hr/week with video screen equipment compared to 30 infants with birth defects whose mothers had not used such equipment in early pregnancy showed no signs of specificity in the type of birth defect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3717170     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700090507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  16 in total

Review 1.  Possible health effects of working with VDUs.

Authors:  U Bergqvist
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-04

2.  Cardiovascular malformations and maternal exposure to video display terminals during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen; K Kurppa; K Rantala
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Is poor pregnancy outcome a risk factor in rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  T D Spector; A J Silman
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of miscarriage and maternal exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy.

Authors:  Beth L Pineles; Edward Park; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Smoking habits among pregnant Danish women: reliability of information recorded after delivery.

Authors:  U Kesmodel; S F Olsen
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  [Pregnancy and professional activity].

Authors:  R Huch
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Pregnancy outcome in women working as dentists, dental assistants or dental technicians.

Authors:  A Ericson; B Källén
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Maternal occupation and congenital heart defects: a case-control study.

Authors:  P Pradat
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Occupational risk factors for congenital heart disease.

Authors:  J Tikkanen; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.