Literature DB >> 3716627

Colorectal cancer: the relationship of staging to survival. A cancer registry study of 800 cases in St. Gallen-Appenzell.

F Enderlin, F Gloor.   

Abstract

Proper classification of colorectal cancer has been critical in determining prognosis. Dukes' staging and its modifications have created considerable confusion. The TNM system has never been widely accepted because of its complexity. The Australian clinico-pathological staging (ACPS) system corresponds closely to Dukes' A, B, C-classification, but it differs from Dukes' in separating a stage D for incurable metastatic disease. Evaluating the compatibility of these 3 different staging systems, a survival analysis is presented of a group of 800 non-selected patients, resected in curative or palliative intention and compiled from the cancer registry of St. Gall-Appenzell. The prognostic importance of accurate staging for colorectal cancer is confirmed. No matter which system is used, in order to give realistic statements it must be based on tumor penetration, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3716627     DOI: 10.1007/bf02091591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soz Praventivmed        ISSN: 0303-8408


  7 in total

1.  The Dukes' A, B and C categorization of the extent of spread of carcinomas of the rectum.

Authors:  J C Goligher
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1976-11

2.  A critical review of the classifications and staging of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L D Zinkin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates.

Authors:  R B Turnbull; K Kyle; F R Watson; J Spratt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Staging of carcinoma of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  D L Roseman; A K Straus
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1980-07

5.  The prognostic significance of tumor location and bowel obstruction in Dukes B and C colorectal cancer. Findings from the NSABP clinical trials.

Authors:  N Wolmark; H S Wieand; H E Rockette; B Fisher; A Glass; W Lawrence; H Lerner; A B Cruz; H Volk; H Shibata
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Terminology and classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma: the Australian clinico-pathological staging system.

Authors:  N C Davis; R C Newland
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1983-06

7.  The relationship of survival to staging and grading of colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 503 cases.

Authors:  R C Newland; P H Chapuis; M T Pheils; J G MacPherson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of colorectal and gastric cancer: survival and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Mohammad R Zali
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.485

2.  Prognostic factors in 1,138 Iranian colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Bijan Moghimi-Dehkordi; Azadeh Safaee; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.571

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.