Literature DB >> 3715875

Pathway of nickel uptake influences its interaction with heterochromatic DNA.

P Sen, M Costa.   

Abstract

Exposure of intact Chinese hamster ovary cells to water-soluble NiCl2 and to particulate crystalline NiS induced a concentration-dependent incidence of chromosomal aberrations which included gaps, breaks, and exchanges. Exposure of cells to crystalline NiS particles caused a high incidence of chromatid exchanges and dicentrics and produced what appears to be an effect on the condensation state of the heterochromatic long arm of the X chromosome. Treatment of cells with NiCl2 did not cause any significant effect on the long arm of the X chromosome, and there was a much lower incidence of the dicentric type of chromosomal aberrations compared to NiS. To examine whether the fragmentation/decondensation of the long arm of the X chromosome produced by crystalline NiS particles was due to a phagocytic pathway of uptake of NiS particles, cells were treated with NiCl2-albumin complexes that had been encapsulated in liposomes. Although treatment of cells with NiCl2-albumin complexes yielded higher intracellular nickel levels than were obtained by treatment of cells with NiCl2, at comparable intracellular levels fragmentation/decondensation of the heterochromatic long arm of the X chromosome was observed when nickel (II) was delivered by way of a liposome but not when cells were treated with unencapsulated NiCl2. Ionic nickel alone irrespective of its delivery mechanism exhibited some preference for heterochromatin, since there was a higher incidence of aberrations observed in the heterochromatic centromeric region of chromosomes. These observations suggest that the pathway of delivery of Ni2+ from NiS particles may be responsible for a preferential interaction of this metal with heterochromatin leading to an effect on the condensation state/fragmentation of the heterochromatic long arm of the X chromosome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3715875     DOI: 10.1016/0041-008x(86)90135-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  7 in total

Review 1.  Molecular biology of nickel carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M Costa; J E Sutherland; W Peng; K Salnikow; L Broday; T Kluz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  In vitro and in vivo uptake of nickel sulfides by rat lymphocytes.

Authors:  H F Hildebrand; A M Decaestecker; F Z Arrouijal; R Martinez
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Respiratory carcinogenicity assessment of soluble nickel compounds.

Authors:  Adriana R Oller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Toxicity, uptake, and mutagenicity of particulate and soluble nickel compounds.

Authors:  G G Fletcher; F E Rossetto; J D Turnbull; E Nieboer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Risk assessment of nickel carcinogenicity and occupational lung cancer.

Authors:  H M Shen; Q F Zhang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Effects of metal treatment on DNA repair in polyamine-depleted HeLa cells with special reference to nickel.

Authors:  R D Snyder
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage.

Authors:  Hongrui Guo; Huan Liu; Hongbin Wu; Hengmin Cui; Jing Fang; Zhicai Zuo; Junliang Deng; Yinglun Li; Xun Wang; Ling Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.