Literature DB >> 3715469

High resolution of mouse chromosomes: banding conservation between man and mouse.

J R Sawyer, J C Hozier.   

Abstract

A detailed schematic representation of high-resolution G-banding patterns was prepared from elongated and finely banded mitotic chromosomes of the mouse. Such chromosomes can be obtained from both animal tissue and cell lines by a simple protocol, facilitating precise demarcation of breakpoints in chromosome rearrangements and aiding in the sublocalization of genes. Regions of subbanding homology were observed between human and mouse chromosomal segments known to have conserved gene assignments, an indication that, at the cytogenetic level, extensive regions of the mammalian genome may remain intact after 60 million years of species divergence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3715469     DOI: 10.1126/science.3715469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  18 in total

1.  A karyotypic analysis of the lesser Malay chevrotain, Tragulus javanicus (Artiodactyla: Tragulidae).

Authors:  D S Gallagher; M L Houck; A M Ryan; J E Womack; A T Kumamoto
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Evident diversity of codon usage patterns of human genes with respect to chromosome banding patterns and chromosome numbers; relation between nucleotide sequence data and cytogenetic data.

Authors:  T Ikemura; K Wada
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Cytogenetics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Thirumulu Ponnuraj Kannan; Bin Alwi Zilfalil
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2009-04

4.  Differential distribution of long and short interspersed element sequences in the mouse genome: chromosome karyotyping by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  A L Boyle; S G Ballard; D C Ward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  High resolution G-banded chromosomes of the mouse.

Authors:  J R Sawyer; M M Moore; J C Hozier
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Evolutionary implications of the human aldolase-A, -B, -C, and -pseudogene chromosome locations.

Authors:  D R Tolan; J Niclas; B D Bruce; R V Lebo
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  The physical map of Mus musculus chromosome 11 reveals evolutionary relationships with different syntenic groups of genes in Homo sapiens.

Authors:  M Münke; U Francke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Automated construction of high-density comparative maps between rat, human, and mouse.

Authors:  A E Kwitek; P J Tonellato; D Chen; J Gullings-Handley; Y S Cheng; S Twigger; T E Scheetz; T L Casavant; M Stoll; M A Nobrega; M Shiozawa; M B Soares; V C Sheffield; H J Jacob
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Extent of the mouse t complex and its inversions shown by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  M F Lyon; J Zenthon; E P Evans; M D Burtenshaw; K R Willison
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.846

10.  Provisional assignment of the gene for uridine monophosphatase-2 (Umph-2) to mouse chromosome 11.

Authors:  D E Wilson; D Woodard; A Sandler; J Erickson; A Gurney
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.