Literature DB >> 3712560

Caliceal calculi.

G E Brannen, W H Bush, G P Lewis.   

Abstract

Primary nonobstructive caliceal calculi were removed by nephrostolithotomy in 51 patients. Among the patients with caliceal stones indications for removal included pain in 36 (71 per cent), associated infection in 11 (21 per cent), progressive stone growth in 2 (4 per cent), hematuria in 1 (2 per cent) and flight status eligibility in 1 (2 per cent). Over-all, 300 patients have undergone percutaneous removal of upper urinary tract calculi, with a 97 per cent success rate. Successful removal was completed percutaneously in 49 patients (96 per cent). One patient remains asymptomatic with retained caliceal fragments and surgical stone removal was required in 1 additional patient. Complications occurred in 4 patients (8 per cent). One patient underwent transcatheter embolization of an intralobar artery to control renal bleeding. Three patients required placement of an internal Double-J ureteral stent to permit resolution of ureteral edema. Following recovery 34 of 36 patients (95 per cent) reported complete resolution of the preoperative pain for which the calculus was removed. Two patients had persistent urinary infection. The remaining patients reported no residual complaints. These observations suggest that pain and discomfort occasionally may be associated with nonobstructive caliceal calculi. Removal of caliceal calculi may permit resolution of associated discomfort in more than 90 per cent of all carefully selected patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3712560     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)46018-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  2 in total

1.  Renal stones on portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT: does intravenous contrast interfere with detection?

Authors:  R Joshua Dym; Dameon R Duncan; Michael Spektor; Hillel W Cohen; Meir H Scheinfeld
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2014-06

2.  Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service.

Authors:  K Patatas; N Panditaratne; T M Wah; M J Weston; H C Irving
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.