Literature DB >> 3710938

Growth, development and body composition in three genetic stocks of swine.

M W Tess, G E Dickerson, J A Nienaber, C L Ferrell.   

Abstract

Differences in growth, chemical body composition and visceral organ development were evaluated in three genetic stocks: Beltsville Highfat (HF) and Lowfat (LF) Duroc-Yorkshire composites and a Hampshire X Large White cross (CX). Ten sets of littermate barrows were used from each stock. One pig from each set was slaughtered at 10, 17 and 24 wk of age. After slaughter, each pig was dissected into three fractions: carcass, head and feet, viscera and blood. Backfat was measured at three locations and visceral organs were weighed separately. Each fraction was frozen, ground, sampled and analyzed in duplicate for protein, fat, water and ash. The CX pigs were heaviest at all ages and contained the most fat-free mass (FFM). The HF pigs were smallest and contained the most fat, while LF pigs tended to be intermediate. The LF pigs deposited a greater proportion of weight in head and feet and a greater proportion of total FFM in the carcass than HF and CX pigs. Estimated allometric growth coefficients for non-fat chemical components relative to empty body weight (EBWT) were lower for HF than LF and CX, which were similar. Coefficients for fat were similar among stocks yet intercepts differed widely. Relative to total FFM, water increased at a faster rate and ash a slower rate in CX pigs compared to HF and LF. Growth coefficients were calculated for internal organs relative to EBWT. Coefficients for organs of the digestive tract were not different among stocks. However, significant differences among stocks were found for heart, lung, spleen and liver that were not explained by differences in body composition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3710938     DOI: 10.2527/jas1986.624968x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Maturing patterns of organ weights in mice selected for rapid postweaning gain.

Authors:  E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Correlated responses in development and distribution of fat depots in mice selected for body composition traits.

Authors:  H Prasetyo; E J Eisen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Fat Deposition and Fat Effects on Meat Quality-A Review.

Authors:  Madison Schumacher; Hannah DelCurto-Wyffels; Jennifer Thomson; Jane Boles
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 4.  Feed energy evaluation for growing pigs.

Authors:  D Y Kil; B G Kim; H H Stein
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.509

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.