Literature DB >> 3710505

Individual differences in sensitivity to transient electrocutaneous stimulation.

W D Larkin, J P Reilly, L B Kittler.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3710505     DOI： 10.1109/TBME.1986.325736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN： 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

1.  Pain perception to the cold pressor test during the menstrual cycle in relation to estrogen levels and a comparison with men.

Authors:  B Hellström; U Lundberg
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun

2.  Inert gas narcosis has no influence on thermo-tactile sensation.

Authors:  Miroljub Jakovljević; Gaj Vidmar; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Limiting electric fields of HVDC overhead power lines.

Authors:  N Leitgeb
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Effects of some different pulse parameters on the perception of intravaginal and intra-anal electrical stimulation.

Authors:  B L Ohlsson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Sex differences in pain and thermal sensitivity: the role of body size.

Authors:  S Lautenbacher; F Strian
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

6.  A 3D Computational Model of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Estimating Aβ Tactile Nerve Fiber Excitability.

Authors:  Kaihua Zhu; Liming Li; Xuyong Wei; Xiaohong Sui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Influence of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cardiac vagal activity: Not different from sham stimulation and no effect of stimulation intensity.

Authors:  Uirassu Borges; Sylvain Laborde; Markus Raab
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.