Literature DB >> 3709608

Intraindividual comparison of moxonidine and prazosin in hypertensive patients.

V Plänitz.   

Abstract

Thirty hypertensive outpatients were treated with moxonidine for 4 weeks in an intraindividual comparison study. After a wash-out period of at least 2 weeks the same patients were given prazosin for 4 weeks. The initial daily doses were 0.2 mg moxonidine and 1 mg prazosin. The antihypertensive dose was titrated individually until the diastolic blood pressure (BP) fell below 95 mm Hg. Within 3 days of dose titration, a mean dose of 0.37 mg moxonidine produced a significant decrease in BP from a mean of 184/100 to 155/90 mm Hg, while in prazosin treated patients 5 to 8 days were necessary to reduce the BP from 180/100 to 149/89 mm Hg; the mean prazosin dose was 2.8 mg. In addition to the lower dose of moxonidine compared to prazosin, it was found that in 67% of patients moxonidine was given once daily whilst prazosin was administered three-time daily in 73%. Within the first week of moxonidine treatment 14/30 patients experienced dryness of the mouth, but it was so mild that the patients did not want to discontinue the trial. In contrast, 3/30 patients discontinued therapy with prazosin because of side effects. The most frequent adverse effects of prazosin were orthostatic dysregulation in 6 patients, pain in the chest in 5, giddiness and tachycardia in 4 and nervousness in 3 patients; no patient had these complaints whilst on moxonidine. In intraindividual comparisons with moxonidine, efficacy, tolerance and the well-being of the patients were significantly better than when on prazosin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3709608     DOI: 10.1007/bf00615953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  13 in total

1.  Effects of prazosin in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  P Bolli; A J Wood; F O Simpson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Long-term use of prazosin in combination or alone for treating hypertension.

Authors:  G S Stokes; J M Gain; J F Mahony; J Raftos; J H Stewart
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1977-08-20       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Treatment of hypertension with prazosin. An open study in general practice.

Authors:  P Fauchald; A Helgeland
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1979

4.  Combined central and peripheral sympathetic blockade: absence of additive antihypertensive effects.

Authors:  F A Hubbell; M A Weber; J I Drayer; D E Rose
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.378

5.  Comparative antihypertensive and endocrinologic effects of clonidine and prazosin in patients with essential hypertension.

Authors:  F A Hubbell; M A Weber; J I Drayer; D E Rose
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Comparison of three different methods of monitoring unwanted effects during antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  C Borghi; G Pallavini; D Comi; G Grillo; M Lombardo; O Mantero; L Minetti; A Selvini; G Suppa
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1984-06

7.  Prazosin first dose phenomenon during combined treatment with a beta-adrenoceptor blocker in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  P Seideman; A Grahnén; K Haglund; B Lindström; C Von Bahr
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Prazosin dynamics in hypertension: relationship to plasma concentration.

Authors:  P Seideman; A Grahnén; K Haglund; B Lindström; C von Bahr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Prazosin kinetics in hypertension.

Authors:  A Grahnén; P Seideman; B Lindström; K Haglund; C von Bahr
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Crossover comparison of moxonidine and clonidine in mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  V Plänitz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  9 in total

1.  A comparison of the haemodynamic and behavioural effects of moxonidine and clonidine in normotensive subjects.

Authors:  G J Macphee; C A Howie; H L Elliott; J L Reid
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The influence of renal function on clinical pharmacokinetics of moxonidine.

Authors:  W Kirch; H J Hutt; V Plänitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Central Sympathetic Inhibition: a Neglected Approach for Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias?

Authors:  Francesca Cagnoni; Maurizio Destro; Erika Bontempelli; Giovanni Locatelli; Dagmara Hering; Markus P Schlaich
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 4.  I1 imidazoline agonists. General clinical pharmacology of imidazoline receptors: implications for the treatment of the elderly.

Authors:  B N Prichard; B R Graham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Moxonidine: a review of its use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  Caroline Fenton; Gillian M Keating; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Moxonidine. A review of its pharmacology, and therapeutic use in essential hypertension.

Authors:  P Chrisp; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effect of moxonidine on urinary electrolyte excretion and renal haemodynamics in man.

Authors:  A Wiecek; D Fliser; M Nowicki; E Ritz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Clinical experience with moxonidine.

Authors:  B N Prichard
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 9.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part II.

Authors:  R Kirsten; K Nelson; D Kirsten; B Heintz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.