Literature DB >> 3709249

Importance of breath size in calibrating the respiratory inductive plethysmograph.

R P Millman, D C Chung, E T Shore.   

Abstract

The usual method of calibrating the respiratory inductive plethysmograph (RIP) is to have the subject breathe over a rather narrow volume range, either resting tidal volume or into a bag containing a fixed larger volume, in both the standing and supine positions. During a previous study in our laboratory using the RIP to quantify ventilation during sleep in young and elderly adults, we began to observe that the accuracy of the RIP measurements could be improved if we calibrated using a wider range of tidal volumes which encompassed the smaller breath sizes we were measuring during sleep. We therefore decided to investigate whether the size of the breaths used for calibrating the RIP was indeed important in improving the accuracy of the device. Eight healthy, nonsmoking young adult men participated in the study. Three sets of calibration factors for the RIP were determined based on low (300 to 500 ml), normal (500 to 800 ml) and high tidal volume (over 800 ml) breaths. Each of these sets of calibration factors were then used to validate three different sets of supine tidal volumes (low, normal, high). For all volumes tested, the RIP values most closely approximated the spirometric volumes when the calibration breaths and validation breaths were of the same size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3709249     DOI: 10.1378/chest.89.6.840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  2 in total

1.  Respiratory inductance plethysmography with an electrical impedance plethysmograph.

Authors:  A M Sinton; R Suntheralingam
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Influence of breathing route on upper airway lining liquid surface tension in humans.

Authors:  Manisha Verma; Margaret Seto-Poon; John R Wheatley; Terence C Amis; Jason P Kirkness
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.182

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.