Literature DB >> 3707798

Influence of obesity on spinal analgesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine.

W J McCulloch, D G Littlewood.   

Abstract

In an unblinded study 50 patients undergoing cystoscopic procedures received a spinal anaesthetic of plain 0.5% bupivacaine 4 ml administered in the sitting position at the L3-4 space. There was a correlation between the height of blockade assessed by pinprick analgesia and the degree of obesity of the patients measured by weight, weight/height, and weight/height2. Using this dose of spinal anaesthetic agent, high blockade may be anticipated in obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3707798     DOI: 10.1093/bja/58.6.610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  11 in total

Review 1.  Spinal anaesthesia.

Authors:  J A Wildsmith
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  The effect of body mass index on the spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kari A Leino; Kristiina S Kuusniemi; Heikki K Pälve; Hannu T Tiusanen; Tapani T Tuppurainen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Ambulatory hernia surgery under local anesthesia is feasible and safe in obese patients.

Authors:  A Acevedo; J León
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  [Secondary cranial extension after spinal anesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine following postural change].

Authors:  O Vicent; R J Litz; M Hübler; T Koch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  The Levels and Duration of Sensory and Motor Blockades of Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Patients That Underwent Urological Operations in the Lithotomy Position.

Authors:  Taner Ciftci; Ali Bestemi Kepekci; Hatice Pınar Yavasca; Hayrettin Daskaya; Volkan İnal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Obesity is independently associated with spinal anesthesia outcomes: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kim; Won Ho Kim; Hyung Woo Lim; Jie Ae Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Byung Seop Shin; Woo Seog Sim; Tae Soo Hahm; Chung Su Kim; Sangmin M Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of fractionated dose versus bolus dose injection in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing elective caesarean section: A randomised, double-blind study.

Authors:  Jigisha Prahaladray Badheka; Vrinda Pravinbhai Oza; Ashutosh Vyas; Deepika Baria; Poonam Nehra; Thomas Babu
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2017-01

Review 8.  Regional anesthesia and obesity.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Abdominal girth and vertebral column length can adjust spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgery, a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Qing-he Zhou; Bo Zhu; Chang-na Wei; Min Yan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Comparison of spinal anesthesia dosage based on height and weight versus height alone in patients undergoing elective cesarean section.

Authors:  Khalid Maudood Siddiqui; Muhammad Asghar Ali; Hameed Ullah
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.