Literature DB >> 3707421

A comparative study of the clinical results obtained with plastipore and ceramic ossicular prostheses in otologic surgery.

M Gersdorff, M Andre.   

Abstract

We describe our experience with clinical tolerance to total and partial ossicular prostheses using ceramic and plastipore and the functional results obtained. We have found that ceramic is well tolerated (with a 4% incidence of rejection) in contrast to plastipore (which had a 19% incidence of rejection). The ceramic partial and total prostheses give satisfactory function results, and 63% and 62% of our patients, respectively, were found to have postoperative air-bone gaps of less than 20 dB, and average air-bone gap gains of 16 and 21 dB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3707421     DOI: 10.1007/bf00457901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0302-9530


  6 in total

1.  [Biocompatible ossicle prosthesis of Proplast and Plastipore. Comparative study in tympanoplasties apropos of 200 cases].

Authors:  M Portmann; J P Bébéar; M Bagot d'Arc
Journal:  Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord)       Date:  1982

2.  Bioactive glass ceramic: a new material in tympanoplasty.

Authors:  R Reck
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Compatibility and long-term stability of glass-ceramic implants.

Authors:  B A Blenckè
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1978-05

4.  Experience with a polyethylene total ossicular replacement prosthesis.

Authors:  S G Harner; G W Facer; T J McDonald
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol       Date:  1979-03

5.  [Tolerance of Plasti-Pore prostheses in ear surgery].

Authors:  M Gersdorff; A F Fourneau
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg       Date:  1980

6.  Ceramic implants in otologic surgery.

Authors:  D Plester; K Jahnke
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1981-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.