Literature DB >> 3707336

Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma. Abdominal computed tomography does not replace celiotomy.

A O Cook, B A Levine, K R Sirinek, H V Gaskill.   

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) has been suggested as an alternative to celiotomy for predicting the stage and resectability of gastric carcinoma. Since it is the policy at our institution to explore all patients regardless of CT findings, this experience was reviewed to see if changes were warranted. Thirty-seven patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative CT scanning. The extent of disease found after operation was compared with the CT assessment. Nineteen patients (51%) were found to have more extensive disease than was predicted by CT. Of the six patients predicted to have widespread disease by CT, three (50%) were found at operation to have disease confined to the stomach or regional nodes. These data support a continued role for celiotomy in managing gastric adenocarcinoma of the stomach since a significant percentage of patients whose disease is believed to be unresectable after CT have potentially curable lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3707336     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400050121016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  10 in total

1.  Laparoscopic staging of gastric cancer is safe and affects treatment strategy.

Authors:  P McCulloch; M Johnson; R Jairam; W Fischer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  U Kleinhaus; D Militianu
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

Review 3.  Preoperative staging of gastrointestinal tumors by endosonography.

Authors:  K Ziegler; C Sanft; M Zeitz; E O Riecken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Spiral computed tomography and operative staging of gastric carcinoma: a comparison with histopathological staging.

Authors:  J Davies; A G Chalmers; H M Sue-Ling; J May; G V Miller; I G Martin; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Is Computed Tomography (CT) Useful in Preoperative Staging?

Authors:  Esther Uña Cidón; Isabel Jiménez Cuenca
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2009-08-12

6.  Liver metastasis in cancer of the stomach and its dependence on the histology of the primary tumor: an autopsy study on 102 cases.

Authors:  W Rhomberg; U Gruber
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: update.

Authors:  U Fink; H J Stein; C Schuhmacher; H J Wilke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  K Ziegler; C Sanft; T Zimmer; M Zeitz; D Felsenberg; H Stein; C Germer; C Deutschmann; E O Riecken
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Scintigraphic detection of gastric and pancreatic carcinomas with In-111 ZCE 025 monoclonal antibody.

Authors:  H H Abdel-Nabi; A N Schwartz; D G Wechter; C S Higano; J A Ortman-Nabi; M W Unger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Preoperative evaluation of the curative resectability of gastric cancer by abdominal computed tomography and ultrasonography: a prospective comparison study.

Authors:  J J Kim; H C Jung; I S Song; K W Choi; C Y Kim; J K Han; B I Choi; J G Park; K U Lee; K J Choe; W H Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.884

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.