Literature DB >> 3706614

The surgical pathology of rheumatic and floppy mitral valves. Distinctive morphologic features upon gross examination.

J van der Bel-Kahn, A E Becker.   

Abstract

A total of 30 surgically resected complete mitral valves were examined, without prior knowledge of the clinical history, to evaluate the reliability of gross inspection only for the correct morphological diagnosis. Twenty valves were rheumatic; 10 were obtained from patients with idiopathic mitral valve prolapse. Two groups were identified: group I correlated with a rheumatic history; group II showed floppy mitral valves, which correlated with mitral valve prolapse. Hence, it is considered that the diagnosis of rheumatic or floppy mitral valve can be established accurately upon gross examination only. The rheumatic valve is fibrotic and firm, leading to thickening and fusion of leaflets and commissures. Narrowing and lowering of the "principal" ostium occurs. This results in a funnel-shaped valve, which is further accentuated by interchordal fusion. Rigidity is its hallmark. Chordal rupture is unlikely. Calcification can be found anywhere in the valve. Hooding is extremely unusual. The floppy valve, by contrast, shows laxity of leaflets, which may lead to the formation of dome-like deformities reaching above the level of the annulus. The chordae are often thin, attenuated, and may have ruptured. The distribution of chordae and mode of anchoring is often chaotic. Fibrosis occurs mainly at the anchoring sites of the chordae underneath or at the margin of the leaflet, or where previously ruptured, intertwined chordae are plastered underneath the dome. Fibrosis is further aggravated at the margins and atrial surface of the leaflets because of regurgitant friction. In spite of fibrosis, the floppy valve remains soft and flexible. Commissural fusion is absent. Interchordal fusion is not a characteristic feature of the floppy mitral valve. Gross inspection will not only correctly discriminate between a rheumatic and floppy mitral valve, but may also contribute to an understanding of the pathogenesis of the valve deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3706614     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198604000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  6 in total

Review 1.  Anatomy of the mitral valve.

Authors:  S Y Ho
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  World Heart Federation criteria for echocardiographic diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease--an evidence-based guideline.

Authors:  Bo Reményi; Nigel Wilson; Andrew Steer; Beatriz Ferreira; Joseph Kado; Krishna Kumar; John Lawrenson; Graeme Maguire; Eloi Marijon; Mariana Mirabel; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Cleonice Mota; John Paar; Anita Saxena; Janet Scheel; John Stirling; Satupaitea Viali; Vijayalakshmi I Balekundri; Gavin Wheaton; Liesl Zühlke; Jonathan Carapetis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Normal echocardiographic mitral and aortic valve thickness in children.

Authors:  Rachel H Webb; Nicola Culliford-Semmens; Karishma Sidhu; Nigel J Wilson
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2017-03-21

4.  Acquired heart valve pathology. An update for the millennium.

Authors:  A E Becker
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  Mitral Valve Pathology.

Authors:  Gregory A Fishbein; Michael C Fishbein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Recurrent incompetence of repaired floppy mitral valves and the severity of myxomatous degeneration.

Authors:  M Nakayama; C Yutani; M Imakita; H Ishibashi-Ueda; N Nishida; Y Kosakai; N Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.