Literature DB >> 3706374

Relationship of beliefs and behavior in test ordering.

A M Epstein, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

Understanding the reasons physicians order diagnostic tests may be useful in designing strategies to promote cost-effective practice and helpful in developing appropriate endpoints for evaluations of new diagnostic technologies. Testing by 27 private office physicians for 324 hypertensive patients was examined and the doctors were surveyed for their beliefs about appropriate levels of use for common tests, how they compared with other doctors in frequency of use, and their reasons for ordering tests. Beliefs about appropriate levels of testing were correlated with actual use (0.45 to 0.63, Pearson). Usage also correlated with beliefs about relative ordering patterns. Annual testing charges incurred by physicians who believed they ordered tests "more frequently" than average were higher than those who believed they ordered tests "less frequently" than average ($122 +/- $46 versus $51 +/- $15, p less than 0.05). Reasons for ordering tests were (in order of importance): establishing a baseline, assessing prognosis, reassuring patients, and helping with treatment decisions. These results suggest that "high usage" physicians may know who they are; and therefore strategies of feedback to modify behavior should be designed to do more than educate physicians about their own utilization. Second, evaluations of technology must consider more than contributions to immediate treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3706374     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90630-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  11 in total

1.  Unnecessary repeat requesting of tests: an audit in a government hospital immunology laboratory.

Authors:  J Kwok; B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  A comparison of self-report and chart audit in studying resident physician assessment of cardiac risk factors.

Authors:  D A Leaf; W E Neighbor; D Schaad; C S Scott
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Variations in the use of diagnostic criteria for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Andreas Roposch; Liang Q Liu; Evangelia Protopapa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Does routine repeat testing of critical laboratory values improve their accuracy?

Authors:  Pooya Baradaran Motie; Ali Zare-Mirzaie; Nasrin Shayanfar; Maryam Kadivar
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-02-09

Review 5.  Detection of autoantibodies in a point-of-care rheumatology setting.

Authors:  Konstantin N Konstantinov; Antonios Tzamaloukas; Robert L Rubin
Journal:  Auto Immun Highlights       Date:  2013-05-18

6.  The most relevant diagnostic criteria for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a study of British specialists.

Authors:  Daniel Williams; Evangelia Protopapa; Kuldeep Stohr; James B Hunter; Andreas Roposch
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Viraj Bhise; Suja S Rajan; Dean F Sittig; Robert O Morgan; Pooja Chaudhary; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Primary care use of laboratory tests in Northern Ireland's Western Health and Social Care Trust: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Magda Bucholc; Maurice O'Kane; Ciaran Mullan; Siobhan Ashe; Liam Maguire
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Value Proposition for Pathologists: A Population Health Approach.

Authors:  Barbara S Ducatman; Alan M Ducatman; James M Crawford; Michael Laposata; Fred Sanfilippo
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2020-01-14

10.  Diagnostic and treatment preferences for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a survey of EPOS and POSNA members.

Authors:  C Alves; W H Truong; M V Thompson; J R Suryavanshi; C L Penny; H T Do; E R Dodwell
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.