Literature DB >> 3706373

Consequences of worksite hypertension screening. Differential changes in psychosocial function.

P Rudd, M G Price, L E Graham, B A Beilstein, S J Tarbell, P Bacchetti, S P Fortmann.   

Abstract

To evaluate reports of psychosocial dysfunction after worksite screening, a three-stage blood pressure screening was performed using standardized screening and labeling procedures. Of a heterogeneous group of 5,888 workers, 296 with sustained hypertension were identified and randomly assigned to traditional arousal or reassurance debriefings, matching each hypertensive subject with one to three normotensive control subjects on eight sociodemographic and occupational variables. Subjects exhibiting absenteeism increases or persistent hypertension six months after screening were randomly assigned to worksite health education programs or no intervention. After adjustment for values among matched control subjects, previously unaware hypertensive subjects had significant post-screening decreases in anxiety that were significantly associated with specific worksites and with reassurance rather than traditional debriefing (p less than 0.05). The health education program did not significantly affect anxiety, blood pressure, or absenteeism. Increased absenteeism was associated with higher baseline anxiety levels (p less than 0.05). It is concluded that worksite hypertension screening produces minimal adverse psychosocial changes, reassurance debriefing may be beneficial, and unspecified worksite characteristics may determine consequences of similar preventive medicine efforts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3706373     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(86)90628-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  8 in total

1.  Screening in practice: Reducing the psychological costs.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

2.  The psychological impact of cardiovascular screening and intervention in primary care: a problem of false reassurance? British Family Heart Study Group.

Authors:  T M Marteau; A L Kinmonth; S Thompson; S Pyke
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  National Hypertension Guidelines: A Review of the India Hypertension Control Initiative (IHCI) and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Swedaj Thakre; Ashish Anjankar; Arihant Singh; Tanishq Kumar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-14

Review 4.  Does anxiety or cardiovascular reactivity have a causal role in hypertension?

Authors:  R H Rosenman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec

5.  Hypertensive labeling: does it have therapeutic implications.

Authors:  W H Birkenhäger
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 7.  Pulse Wave Velocity in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Hiromichi Suzuki; Kazuoki Kondo
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2013-03-11

8.  Combination of Echocardiography and Pulse Wave Velocity Provides Clues for the Differentiation between White Coat Hypertension and Hypertension in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Hiromichi Suzuki; Kazuhiro Kobayashi; Hirokazu Okada
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.