Literature DB >> 3700256

Scalp potentials of normal and hearing-impaired subjects in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones.

S Kuwada, R Batra, V L Maher.   

Abstract

None of the current electrical audiometric procedures, alone or in combination, has yet achieved the precision of conventional audiometric testing that is used to assess hearing in verbally capable children and adults. The reason for this, in part, lies in the use of stimuli which have a wide frequency content. We have measured scalp potentials which follow the envelopes of sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones: a frequency-specific stimulus. In normal subjects such amplitude-modulation following responses (AMFRs) appear to be generated by two sources. One source has a latency of about 30 ms, generates large responses and is only observed at modulations below 55 Hz, while the other source has a latency of 7-9 ms, generates smaller responses, and is only observed at modulations from 100-350 Hz. The latencies of these two sources are consistent with origins in the cortex and midbrain, respectively. We examined AMFRs to low frequency (50 Hz) modulations as a possible audiometric tool. In normal subjects, the amplitude of the AMFR increased as a function of intensity, decreased as a function of carrier frequency, and could be evoked across the whole audiometric range (250-8000 Hz). In hearing-impaired subjects, the AMFR amplitudes as a function of carrier frequency accurately reflected the pattern of hearing loss on a frequency-by-frequency basis. In most subjects, the threshold for evoking the AMFR was within 0-25 dB of hearing threshold. It therefore appears that the AMFR may be a potentially useful tool to assess hearing in those unable to undergo conventional audiometric testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3700256     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90038-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  41 in total

1.  Two measures of temporal resolution in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Kenneth S Henry; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Modulation rate transfer functions in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) with normal hearing and high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  James J Finneran; Hollis R London; Dorian S Houser
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  [Acoustic evoked potentials. The nomenclature in terminological transition].

Authors:  I Baljić; M Walger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kiyokawa; Tetsuaki Kawase; Hidetoshi Oshima; Atsuko Maki; Toshimitsu Kobayashi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Auditory fear conditioning modifies steady-state evoked potentials in the rat inferior colliculus.

Authors:  André Luiz Vieira Lockmann; Flávio Afonso Gonçalves Mourão; Marcio Flávio Dutra Moraes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Hemispheric asymmetry of auditory steady-state responses to monaural and diotic stimulation.

Authors:  Hanne Poelmans; Heleen Luts; Maaike Vandermosten; Pol Ghesquière; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-08-28

7.  Tone-evoked brainstem responses and auditory steady state responses to 40hz and 80hz amplitude modulated stimuli with different frequencies - a comparative study.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Kumar; Sujeet Kumar Sinha; Jayashree S Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-07-23

8.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Temporal envelope of time-compressed speech represented in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Richard A Reale; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Christopher K Kovach; Haiming Chen; Matthew A Howard; John F Brugge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Towards a Diagnosis of Cochlear Neuropathy with Envelope Following Responses.

Authors:  Luke A Shaheen; Michelle D Valero; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.