Literature DB >> 370019

Comparison of sulfamethoxazole alone and combined with trimethoprim in urinary tract infections.

T Bergan, O Skjerven.   

Abstract

In a double blind, randomized study, sulfamethoxazole was compared alone and in combination with trimethoprim as commonly used in therapeutic regimes for the treatment of uncomplicated acute urinary tract infections in out-patients. The cure of sulfamethoxazole alone was 92.2%, and for sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim 97.6%. The rate of side-effects for the former was 5%, for the latter 21.8%. If the failure rate plus the rate of occurrence of rash, which necessitated discontinuing the drug, are combined, it appears that 8.8% of the patients were at a disadvantage receiving sulfamethoxazole compared to 9.7% for the combination of sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim. When considering the cure rate and rate of side-effects together, therefore, the position of sulfamethoxazole alone as a suitable drug in this type of infection is defended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 370019     DOI: 10.1007/bf01640549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infection        ISSN: 0300-8126            Impact factor:   3.553


  14 in total

1.  Clinical experience with a new sulfonamide sulphamethoxazole.

Authors:  J L HOLLOMAN; R E FULLILOVE; C M YERGAN; E BAROUK
Journal:  Appl Ther       Date:  1961-10

2.  Long-term treatment of pyelonephritis and other urinary tract infections with a new combination of sulfanilamides.

Authors:  P A ORSTEN; H BUCHT; A HOLMGARD; B JOSEPHSON
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Adverse drug reactions during treatment of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  L E Böttiger; B Westerholm
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-07-19       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Efficacy of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and the combination of both in acute urinary tract infection. Clinical and pharmacokinetical studies.

Authors:  U J Koch; K P Schumann; R Küchler; H Kewitz
Journal:  Chemotherapy       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 2.544

5.  A cooperative controlled study of the use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in chronic urinary tract infections.

Authors:  R A Gleckman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Clinical experience with adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  J M Frisch
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  [Sulfonamides].

Authors:  T Bergan
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  1973-11-30

8.  Long-term treatment of persistent or recurrent urinary tract infection with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.

Authors:  F O'Grady; I K Fry; A McSherry; W R Cattell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  [Importance of urinary and plasmatic concentrations of a chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of urinary infections. Comparative study on 3 sulfonamides].

Authors:  J Scherer; H C Plattner
Journal:  Schweiz Med Wochenschr       Date:  1967-10

10.  Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection.

Authors:  W Brumfitt; R Pursell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-06-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Bioactivation of Trimethoprim to Protein-Reactive Metabolites in Human Liver Microsomes.

Authors:  Jennifer L Goldman; Yakov M Koen; Steven A Rogers; Kelin Li; James S Leeder; Robert P Hanzlik
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 2.  Co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole): an updated review of its antibacterial activity and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  G P Wormser; G T Keusch; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.