Literature DB >> 3700173

Tumor radioresponsiveness versus fractionation sensitivity.

H D Thames, H D Suit.   

Abstract

Since the introduction of mammalian cell survival curves, the parameters D0 and N have been used as quantitative measures of inherent radiation sensitivity, as was the shoulder width Dq. These parameters are more generally applicable at high doses. We propose to introduce a measure of tumor radioresponsitivity that is more applicable to the clinical treatment schedules that employ small fractional doses (1-2 Gy), the ratio alpha/E, derived from the linear quadratic model for cell inactivation as the intercept on the reciprocal-dose plot. For tumor-control experiments this ratio is the reciprocal of the TCD50 when radiation is given in very small fractions or at low dose rates (assuming negligible clonogen proliferation). The rationales for this choice are: alpha is a measure of the steepness of the initial linear segment of the dose-survival curve. Accordingly, at doses per fraction of 1-2 Gy the observed effect increases with alpha. E is by definition a positive measure of the clonogen kill required for a specified tumor response, e.g., E = -log (surviving fraction of clonogens at the 50% control level). Therefore it is also a measure of the number of clonogens present at the time of inception of treatment, which for a given dose is a prime determinant of the probability of tumor control. This measure of radioresponsitivity is to be distinguished from the ratio alpha/beta, which is a measure of fractionation sensitivity. A survey of the literature indicates that these do not correlate, except in highly hypoxic tumors (e.g., clamped); such tumors are characterized by low radioresponsitivity as well as low fractionation sensitivity (high alpha/beta ratio). There are at present only limited data for determination of this ratio, however, since reciprocal-dose analysis requires tumor control doses for several different sizes of dose per fraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3700173     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(86)90081-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  19 in total

1.  [A linear quadratic analysis of the effect of different fractionation patterns on local tumor control: a study on human squamous-cell carcinomas in nude mice].

Authors:  C Petersen; M Baumann; H H Dubben; H Arps; A Melenkeit; J Helfrich
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for primary and metastatic sarcomas involving the spine.

Authors:  U K Chang; W I Cho; D H Lee; M S Kim; C K Cho; S Y Lee; D G Jeon
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Effect of primary tumor location and tumor size on the response to radiotherapy for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Doi; Kenji Uemoto; Osamu Suzuki; Koichi Yamada; Norihisa Masai; Daisaku Tatsumi; Hiroya Shiomi; Ryoong-Jin Oh
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 4.  Preoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma; past, present and future perspectives on dose fractionation regimens and combined modality strategies.

Authors:  Rick L M Haas; Aisha B Miah; Cécile LePechoux; Thomas F DeLaney; Elizabeth H Baldini; Kaled Alektiar; Brian O'Sullivan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  A Phase II Trial of 5-Day Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy for Patients with High-Risk Primary Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  Anusha Kalbasi; Mitchell Kamrava; Fang-I Chu; Donatello Telesca; Ritchell Van Dams; Yingli Yang; Dan Ruan; Scott D Nelson; Sarah M Dry; Jackie Hernandez; Bartosz Chmielowski; Arun S Singh; Susan V Bukata; Nicholas M Bernthal; Michael L Steinberg; Joanne B Weidhaas; Fritz C Eilber
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Patient Reported Outcomes in NRG Oncology RTOG 0938, Evaluating Two Ultrahypofractionated Regimens for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Himanshu R Lukka; Stephanie L Pugh; Deborah W Bruner; Jean-Paul Bahary; Colleen A F Lawton; Jason A Efstathiou; Rajat J Kudchadker; Lee E Ponsky; Samantha A Seaward; Ian S Dayes; Darindra D Gopaul; Jeff M Michalski; Guila Delouya; Irving D Kaplan; Eric M Horwitz; Mack Roach; Wayne H Pinover; David C Beyer; John O Amanie; Howard M Sandler; Lisa A Kachnic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The application of radiation therapy to the Pediatric Preclinical Testing Program (PPTP): results of a pilot study in rhabdomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Rita Kaplon; Mersiha Hadziahmetovic; Jim Sommerfeld; Kathryn Bondra; Lanchun Lu; Justin Leasure; Phuong Nguyen; Kelsey McHugh; Ning Li; Christopher Chronowski; Nikhil Sebastian; Mamta Singh; Raushan Kurmasheva; Peter Houghton; Christopher E Pelloski
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Rationale, conduct, and outcome using hypofractionated radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Ritter
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Application of IMRT in adjuvant treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the thigh-Preliminary results.

Authors:  Anna Sladowska; Marcin Hetnał; Paweł Dymek; Damian Kabat; Kamil Kisielewicz; Michał Wawrzak; Paweł Zawadzki; Jan Lesiak; Edward Byrski; Michał Waligórski
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-04-08

10.  Hypofractionation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark Ritter; Jeffrey Forman; Patrick Kupelian; Colleen Lawton; Daniel Petereit
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.