Literature DB >> 3698492

Assessment of bone age: a comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and the Tanner and Whitehouse methods.

G R Milner, R K Levick, R Kay.   

Abstract

A comparison of two methods of bone-age estimation has been made using the hand and wrist radiographs of 66 boys and 58 girls. An estimate made using the specialist auxological technique of Tanner and Whitehouse was compared with three separate estimates obtained by the atlas matching method of Greulich and Pyle (1971). Two of the latter estimates were carried out by two dedicated radiologists whose results showed close agreement. The third estimate made using the Greulich and Pyle method was derived from the routine reports of a number of radiologists at initial presentation. Only in one narrow age-range for girls was there a significant inter-observer difference, and the reasons for this are discussed. Estimates made using the method of Greulich and Pyle were younger than those made using that of Tanner and Whitehouse. There was a linear relationship between the two methods for the boys but not for the girls. It is suggested that atlas matching methods still have a valuable place in non-specialist hospitals concerned with initial diagnosis rather than with the long-term care of growth problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698492     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(86)80376-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  15 in total

1.  Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods.

Authors:  R K Bull; P D Edwards; P M Kemp; S Fry; I A Hughes
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Computer-assisted bone age assessment: graphical user interface for image processing and comparison.

Authors:  Ewa Pietka; Arkadiusz Gertych; Sylwia Pospiechâ Euro Kurkowska; Fei Cao; H K Huang; Vincente Gilzanz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A fuzzy-based growth model with principle component analysis selection for carpal bone-age assessment.

Authors:  Chi-Wen Hsieh; Tzu-Chiang Liu; Tai-Lang Jong; Chui-Mei Tiu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Bone age estimation and prediction of final height in patients with beta-thalassaemia major: a comparison between the two most common methods.

Authors:  Athanasios Christoforidis; Maria Badouraki; George Katzos; Miranda Athanassiou-Metaxa
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-10-19

5.  A novel large fragment deletion in PLS3 causes rare X-linked early-onset osteoporosis and response to zoledronic acid.

Authors:  F Lv; M Ma; W Liu; X Xu; Y Song; L Li; Y Jiang; O Wang; W Xia; X Xing; Z Qiu; M Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Implementation and statistical evaluation of a web-based software for bone age assessment.

Authors:  Metin Yildiz; Albert Guvenis; Esra Guven; Didar Talat; Mahmut Haktan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Assessment of bone age in prepubertal healthy Korean children: comparison among the Korean standard bone age chart, Greulich-Pyle method, and Tanner-Whitehouse method.

Authors:  Jeong Rye Kim; Young Seok Lee; Jeesuk Yu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Bone age assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in children: an alternative for X-ray?

Authors:  D H M Heppe; H R Taal; G D S Ernst; E L T Van Den Akker; M M H Lequin; A C S Hokken-Koelega; J J M Geelhoed; V W V Jaddoe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Skeletal age in idiopathic short stature: An analytical study by the TW3 method, Greulich and Pyle method.

Authors:  Hak Jun Kim; Hae-Ryong Song; Ashok Shyam; Song Sang Heon; Ranjith Unnikrishnan; Sang-Youn Song
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  How reliable are the risk estimates for X-ray examinations in forensic age estimations? A safety update.

Authors:  F Ramsthaler; P Proschek; W Betz; M A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.