Literature DB >> 3694747

The radial forearm flap in head and neck reconstruction.

H B Evans1, H B Lampe.   

Abstract

The radial forearm flap has proven to be a very reliable and versatile technique for reconstructing head and neck defects. It is of particular value where segmental defects in the mandible and intraoral mucosa exist, and in reconstructing defects within radiated tissue. The skin of the flap drapes well over the radial bone to allow denture fitting. The radial bone provides an adequate bony strut to allow essentially normal mandibular function. In a previously radiated bed, the flap (from a non-irradiated area) has the virtue of being highly vascular, thus benefiting wound healing. The lack of bulk in the flap prevents separation at the site of inset as wound healing occurs. It is a one-stage reconstruction, and since the donor site is on the upper extremity, early patient mobilization is possible. The donor defect is cosmetically acceptable, and since it lies against the body in the position of rest, it is not frequently exposed. The osseous portion of the flap in a postmenopausal woman should be approached with caution and patients should be warned of the risk of radius fracture. This flap is capable of providing tissue for reconstruction of the head and neck and should be considered for closure of all major defects, particularly those with bone defects or in defects created postirradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3694747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0381-6605


  4 in total

1.  [The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. A "second defensive line" in microvascular reconstructions of defects in the head and neck area].

Authors:  J Schipper; T Klenzner; I Arapakis; W Maier; R Horch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Soft Tissue Microvascular Reconstruction of Orbital Exenteration Defects.

Authors:  Arvind Badhey; Yarah Haidar; Eric Genden
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Outcome and complications of 540 microvascular free flaps: the Hamburg experience.

Authors:  Philipp Pohlenz; Marco Blessmann; Felix Blake; Lei Li; Rainer Schmelzle; Max Heiland
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Alternatives to free flap surgery for maxillofacial reconstruction: focus on the submental island flap and the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap.

Authors:  J K Meier; S Spoerl; G Spanier; M Wunschel; M J Gottsauner; J Schuderer; T E Reichert; T Ettl
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.