Literature DB >> 3693724

Pain assessment by patients and nurses in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction.

E Bondestam1, K Hovgren, F Gaston Johansson, S Jern, J Herlitz, S Holmberg.   

Abstract

In 47 patients admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) at Sahlgren's Hospital in Göteborg, Sweden, due to acute myocardial infarction (MI) the intensity of pain independently assessed by the patient and by the nurse on duty was evaluated during the first 24 hours in CCU. Pain was assessed according to a modified numerical rating scale graded from 0-10, where 0 meant no pain and 10 meant the most severe pain. A positive correlation between the patients' and nurses' assessments was found (r = 0.76; P less than 0.001). However, the nurses under-estimated the patients' pain in 23% of the situations and over-estimated it in 20%. Over-estimation was particularly found when heart rate and blood pressure increased. Many patients scoring their pain to fairly high degrees were not given pain-relieving treatment. Treatment with morphine did not cause substantial pain relief in a substantial number of patients. A significantly positive correlation was found between the patients' and nurses' assessments of pain, although under-estimation as well as over-estimation occurred. A few patients with severe pain were not treated and when treatment was given it was often ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3693724     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01369.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  6 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of pain in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz; A Hjalmarson; F Waagstein
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-01

2.  The effects of medical evidence and pain intensity on medical student judgments of chronic pain patients.

Authors:  J T Chibnall; R C Tait; L R Ross
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1997-06

3.  Single-item indicators in nursing research.

Authors:  J M Youngblut; G R Casper
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Hitting them where it hurts? Low dose nalbuphine therapy.

Authors:  M Woollard; T Jones; K Pitt; N Vetter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Analgesia in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Herlitz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Less IS less: a randomised controlled trial comparing cautious and rapid nalbuphine dosing regimens.

Authors:  M Woollard; R Whitfield; K Smith; T Jones; G Thomas; G Thomas; C Hinton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.740

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.