Literature DB >> 3693547

Collaborative investigation of the accuracy and reproducibility of Sceptor Breakpoint susceptibility panels.

G A Denys1, S L Hansen, W A Pope, H Lilli, J M Hejna.   

Abstract

A combination Sceptor Breakpoint/ID panel (Johnston Laboratories, Inc., Towson, Md.), which determines interpretive susceptibility results (susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant) using two to three selected concentrations of antimicrobial agents, was tested in comparison with full-range Sceptor microdilution MIC panels. The inter- and intralaboratory interpretive reproducibilities for 24 control strains tested in three laboratories on three consecutive days were 97.0 and 95.7%, respectively. The equivalency of breakpoint results to category results obtained by the microdilution MIC procedure for 10,368 control organism-antimicrobial agent comparisons was 94.1%. The level of interpretive agreement between breakpoint and MIC category results using 101 fresh clinical isolates was 97.0% for 51 gram-negative and 50 gram-positive bacteria. Among the total 4,872 clinical organism-antimicrobial agent comparisons, major and very major discrepancies were seen in 0.2% of gram-negative bacteria and very major discrepancies were seen in 0.9% of gram-positive bacteria. All very major discrepancies with gram-positive organisms were associated with trailing endpoints using trimethoprim or sulfisoxazole and staphylococci. The breakpoint concept of testing selective antimicrobial agent concentrations was highly reproducible and accurate and allows for placement of more antimicrobial agents into a panel than is possible with full-dilution MIC testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3693547      PMCID: PMC269437          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2189-2192.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Susceptibility testing with the sensititer breakpoint broth microdilution system.

Authors:  G V Doern; A Dascal; M Keville
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Responsibility of the infectious disease community for optimal use of antibiotics: views of the membership of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  C M Kunin; S Chambers
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

3.  Evaluation of the Sceptor microdilution antibiotic susceptibility testing system: a collaborative investigation.

Authors:  R N Jones; C Thornsberry; A L Barry; T L Gavan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentrations: rationale for use of selected antimicrobial concentrations.

Authors:  F G Witebsky; J D Maclowry; S S French
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The role of beta-lactamase in staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins and cephalosporins.

Authors:  L K McDougal; C Thornsberry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of veterinary clinical isolates with the Sceptor System.

Authors:  J R Papp; C A Muckle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Prevalence of blaZ gene types and the inoculum effect with cefazolin among bloodstream isolates of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  D J Livorsi; E Crispell; S W Satola; E M Burd; R Jerris; Y F Wang; M M Farley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Definition and determination of in vitro antibiotic susceptibility breakpoints for bacteria in France. The Comité de l'Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie.

Authors:  C J Soussy; R Cluzel; P Courvalin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Interpretation of trailing endpoints in antifungal susceptibility testing by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards method.

Authors:  S G Revankar; W R Kirkpatrick; R K McAtee; A W Fothergill; S W Redding; M G Rinaldi; T F Patterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.