Literature DB >> 3692651

Biomechanical studies of elite female distance runners.

K R Williams1, P R Cavanagh, J L Ziff.   

Abstract

The experiments showed the elite women runners to be predominantly midfoot strikers. Their ground reaction forces showed peaks of 3.3 times body weight in the vertical component, 0.8 times body weight in the braking phase, and 0.3 times body weight in the mediolateral direction. The asymmetry in their ground reaction forces was expressed mainly in the mediolateral component. Only minor differences were found between ground reaction forces in racing and training shoes. More abduction during foot placement was associated with greater rearfoot motion and with greater change in mediolateral component of velocity. Among the numerous moderate to high correlations of interest were those between vertical oscillation and peak vertical force, crossover and change in mediolateral velocity, and between movements of the swing leg and mediolateral force values. There were very few correlations between running economy and biomechanical variables, and stride length correlated poorly with stature. The elite runners were shorter in stature, lighter, had shorter legs and considerably less iliac crest fat than a typical non-athletic female population. The runners also had narrower pelves than a student population of similar age. They were reasonably homogeneous and symmetrical in anthropometric dimensions. Compared with a group of elite male runners at the same running velocity, the elite women exhibited more hip flexion, greater angular velocities in hip flexion and extension, and longer stride lengths relative to leg length during running. Their vertical oscillation (expressed relative to leg length) was less than that shown by their male counterparts. On the issue of relative pelvic width, the women had greater relative bitrochanteric and bi-iliac crest widths but similar bispinous widths compared to the elite male runners (all values expressed relative to leg length). Clearly the issue of male-female pelvic width differences at the elite level is not as simple as had previously been suggested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3692651     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1025715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  18 in total

Review 1.  The physiology of the highly trained female endurance runner.

Authors:  M Burrows; S Bird
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Biomechanical factors contributing to marathon race success.

Authors:  Keith R Williams
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Influence of gait manipulation on running economy in female distance runners.

Authors:  Wayland Tseh; Jennifer L Caputo; Don W Morgan
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Short-term changes in 10-km race pace aerobic demand and gait mechanics following a bout of high-intensity distance running.

Authors:  D W Morgan; H S Strohmeyer; J T Daniels; C C Beaudoin; M W Craib; R A Borden; P J Greer; C L Burleson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

Review 5.  The effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners.

Authors:  Joel T Fuller; Clint R Bellenger; Dominic Thewlis; Margarita D Tsiros; Jonathan D Buckley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed.

Authors:  Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Implications of Impaired Endurance Performance following Single Bouts of Resistance Training: An Alternate Concurrent Training Perspective.

Authors:  Kenji Doma; Glen B Deakin; David J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold and running economy in women and men with similar performances level in marathons.

Authors:  J Helgerud
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

Review 9.  Biomechanics and running economy.

Authors:  T Anderson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Influence of training, sex, age and body mass on the energy cost of running.

Authors:  M Bourdin; J Pastene; M Germain; J R Lacour
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.