Literature DB >> 3691693

Voluntary smooth eye movements with foveally stabilized targets.

A V van den Berg1, H Collewijn.   

Abstract

We investigated the capacity of 6 humans to make voluntary smooth eye movements with a horizontally stabilized foveal point target. When the target was viewed on a dark field, all subjects were able to make smooth oscillatory eye movements when they attempted to imitate their own normal pursuit of sinusoidal target movement (0.2-0.7 Hz) directly preceding the stabilization on the fovea. The frequency of the imitating eye movement was in general lower than the frequency of normal pursuit by 2-35%. While fixating a foveally stabilized point target superimposed on a large, sinusoidally moving non-stabilized background, all subjects were able to make either no eye movements, eye movements nearly in phase with or eye movements nearly in counterphase with the background movement depending on the instruction to imagine the target as head-stationary, moving in phase, or moving in counterphase with the background. The accuracy of the frequency of the smooth eye movement with the stabilized target on the moving background was higher than during imitation of pursuit on the dark field but the precision of the frequency was lower than during normal pursuit. When the background moved pseudo-randomly all subjects could voluntarily inhibit their smooth eye movements or could make smooth eye movements in phase with the background. Only 2 subjects showed a limited ability to make smooth eye movements opposite to the pseudo-random background movement. The results suggest that with predictable background movement the volition of the subject rather than the movement of the background determines the eye movements when the subject looks at the foveally stabilized target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3691693     DOI: 10.1007/bf00255245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  17 in total

Review 1.  Investigations of the eye tracking system through stabilized retinal images.

Authors:  G Kommerell; R Täumer
Journal:  Bibl Ophthalmol       Date:  1972

Review 2.  The effect of gaze motor signals and spatially directed attention on eye movements and visual perception.

Authors:  O J Grüsser
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Human fixation and pursuit in normal and open-loop conditions: effects of central and peripheral retinal targets.

Authors:  H Collewijn; E P Tamminga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  On the predictive control of foveal eye tracking and slow phases of optokinetic and vestibular nystagmus.

Authors:  S Yasui; L R Young
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Smooth pursuit eye movements under open-loop and closed-loop conditions.

Authors:  H J Wyatt; J Pola
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Limit cycle oscillations of the human eye.

Authors:  M Scotto; G A Oliva
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  A mechanism for suppression of optokinesis.

Authors:  H J Wyatt; J Pola
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Active and passive smooth eye movements: effects of stimulus size and location.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Perceived visual motion as effective stimulus to pursuit eye movement system.

Authors:  S Yasui; L R Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds.

Authors:  H Collewijn; E P Tamminga
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  8 in total

1.  Suppression of optokinesis by a stabilized target: effects of instruction and stimulus frequency.

Authors:  J Pola; H J Wyatt; M Lustgarten
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  Velocity scaling of cue-induced smooth pursuit acceleration obeys constraints of natural motion.

Authors:  Jennifer Ladda; Thomas Eggert; Stefan Glasauer; Andreas Straube
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamics of smooth pursuit maintenance.

Authors:  Abtine Tavassoli; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Suppression of OKN and VOR by afterimages and imaginary objects.

Authors:  I P Howard; D Giaschi; C M Murasugi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Enhanced top-down control during pursuit eye tracking in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Andreas Sprenger; Peter Trillenberg; Matthias Nagel; John A Sweeney; Rebekka Lencer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Human smooth pursuit during transient perturbations of predictable and unpredictable target movement.

Authors:  A V van den Berg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Volitional control of anticipatory ocular pursuit responses under stabilised image conditions in humans.

Authors:  G Barnes; S Goodbody; S Collins
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.