Literature DB >> 3691270

Cecostomy revisited. Still a useful operation.

P J Huber1, V Dreicer, J Hunt.   

Abstract

The necessity of a cecostomy in the management of large-bowel obstruction continues to be debated. Recent reviews have tended to discredit or disregard this therapeutic method in favor of the colostomy. Past criticism has focused on three central issues. First, local stomal care is difficult. Second, satisfactory bowel preparation cannot be accomplished. Third, a high incidence of surgical closure of the cecostomy is reported. In light of this continuous controversy, a retrospective review of tube cecostomies was conducted to assess the indications, morbidity, and success or failure associated with this treatment modality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3691270     DOI: 10.1007/bf02554285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  1 in total

1.  Abdominal wall cellulitis and sepsis secondary to percutaneous cecostomy.

Authors:  T J Maginot; P N Cascade
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.