Literature DB >> 3690236

Prospective 14- to 18-year follow-up study after parietal cell vagotomy.

J Hoffmann1, A Olesen, H E Jensen.   

Abstract

One hundred and thirty-five patients underwent elective parietal cell vagotomy for duodenal, pyloric or prepyloric ulcers. The patients were followed prospectively at intervals of 1-3 years in order to detect postvagotomy symptoms and recurrent ulcers; 14-18 years after surgery 106 patients were studied with regard to recurrent ulceration and 84 concerning postvagotomy symptoms. Thirty-two patients (30 per cent) had developed proven recurrent ulcers and a further 9 per cent were suspected of having recurrences. Two patients were reoperated for gastric outlet obstruction and one for bile reflux gastritis. Four patients had severe dyspeptic symptoms and four severe dyspepsia plus dumping. No patient had severe diarrhoea. Forty-three patients were regarded as failures after parietal cell vagotomy. After treatment of these failures 88 per cent of the patients available for subsequent follow-up had satisfactory results. The alternatives to parietal cell vagotomy are discussed. It is concluded that although parietal cell vagotomy has a high long-term recurrence rate, this disadvantage is outweighed by the low incidence severe postvagotomy symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3690236     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800741132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  12 in total

1.  Parietal cell vagotomy and dilatation for peptic duodenal stricture.

Authors:  A S Menteş
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Prospective controlled vagotomy trial for duodenal ulcer. Results after 11-15 years.

Authors:  J Hoffmann; H E Jensen; J Christiansen; A Olesen; F B Loud; O Hauch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  An overlooked factor in duodenal ulceration and postoperative recurrence?

Authors:  R M Kirk
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Differences in gastric emptying between highly selective vagotomy and posterior truncal vagotomy combined with anterior seromyotomy.

Authors:  T M Chang; T H Chen; S S Tsou; Y C Liu; K L Shen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Long-term clinical results of highly selective vagotomy performed between 1980 and 1990.

Authors:  M Ihász; J Bátorfi; A Bálint; T Fazekas; M Máté; G Pòsfai; J Sándor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 6.  Evaluation and management of patients with recurrent peptic ulcer disease after acid-reducing operations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Richard H Turnage; George Sarosi; Byron Cryer; Stuart Spechler; Walter Peterson; Mark Feldman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Anterior lesser curve seromyotomy with posterior truncal vagotomy versus proximal gastric vagotomy: results of a prospective randomized trial 3-8 years after surgery.

Authors:  H S Walia; H A Abd el-Karim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  [Results of selective proximal vagotomy after 13 years].

Authors:  F Herbst; E Gruber; T Pratschner; R Schiessel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

9.  Parietal cell vagotomy. A 23-year study.

Authors:  S Meisner; J Hoffmann; H E Jensen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Current status of proximal gastric vagotomy.

Authors:  B D Schirmer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.