Literature DB >> 3689774

Immunologic analysis of human breast cancer progesterone receptors. 2. Structure, phosphorylation, and processing.

L L Wei1, P L Sheridan, N L Krett, M D Francis, D O Toft, D P Edwards, K B Horwitz.   

Abstract

We have used a monoclonal antibody (MAb) directed against chick oviduct progesterone receptors (PR), that cross-reacts with human PR, to analyze PR structure and phosphorylation. This MAb, designated PR-6, interacts only with B receptors (Mr 120,000) of T47D human breast cancer cells; it has no affinity for A receptors (Mr 94,000) or for proteolytic fragments from either protein. The antibody immunoprecipitates native B receptors and was used to study the structure of native untransformed 8S and transformed 4S receptors, using sucrose density gradient analysis, photoaffinity labeling, and gel electrophoresis. On molybdate-containing low-salt gradients, PR-6 complexes with 8S B receptors, causing their shift to the bottom of the gradient while A receptors remain at 8 S. Therefore, A and B receptors form separate 8S complexes, and we conclude that A and B do not dimerize in the holoreceptor. Similar gradient studies using salt-containing, molybdate-free buffers show that there are two forms of salt-transformed 4S receptors, comprising either A proteins or B proteins, suggesting that A and B are also not linked to one another in transformed PR. The independence of A- and B-receptor complexes was confirmed by the finding that purified, transformed B receptors bind well to DNA-cellulose. Since PR-6 cross-reacts with nuclear PR, it was used to analyze nuclear PR processing--a down-regulation step associated with receptor loss as measured by hormone binding. Insoluble nuclear receptors and soluble cytosol receptors were measured by immunoblotting following treatment of T47D cells for 5 min to 48 h with either R5020 or progesterone. From 8 to 48 h after R5020 treatment, immunoassayable receptors decreased in nuclei and were not recovered in cytosols. Nuclear receptors also decreased after progesterone treatment but replenished in cytosols between 8 and 24 h after the start of treatment. Thus, processing involves a true loss of nuclear receptor protein, and not just loss of hormone binding activity, and occurs after progesterone or R5020 treatment. This loss is chronic, however, only in R5020-treated cells. Additional studies focused on the covalent modifications of receptors. We previously described shifts in apparent molecular weight of nuclear PR following R5020 treatment using in situ photoaffinity labeling. To show whether these shifts can be explained by receptor phosphorylation, untreated cells and hormone-treated cells were metabolically labeled with [32P]orthophosphate, and the B receptors were isolated by immunoprecipitation with PR-6 and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel electrophoresis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3689774     DOI: 10.1021/bi00393a046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  10 in total

1.  Heterotetrameric structure of the human progesterone receptor.

Authors:  P Rehberger; M Rexin; U Gehring
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells.

Authors:  C Hurd; K Nag; N Khattree; P Alban; S Dinda; V K Moudgil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.396

3.  Binding of heat shock proteins to the avian progesterone receptor.

Authors:  S L Kost; D F Smith; W P Sullivan; W J Welch; D O Toft
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  In vivo evidence against the existence of antiprogestins disrupting receptor binding to DNA.

Authors:  K Delabre; A Guiochon-Mantel; E Milgrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Protein kinase A activation of glucocorticoid-mediated signaling in the developing retina.

Authors:  H Zhang; Y C Li; A P Young
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Hormone-induced progesterone receptor phosphorylation consists of sequential DNA-independent and DNA-dependent stages: analysis with zinc finger mutants and the progesterone antagonist ZK98299.

Authors:  G S Takimoto; D M Tasset; A C Eppert; K B Horwitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Phosphorylation of immunopurified rat liver glucocorticoid receptor by the catalytic subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  T Haske; M Nakao; V K Moudgil
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1994-03-30       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Heregulin induces transcriptional activation of the progesterone receptor by a mechanism that requires functional ErbB-2 and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Leticia Labriola; Mariana Salatino; Cecilia J Proietti; Adalí Pecci; Omar A Coso; Alberto R Kornblihtt; Eduardo H Charreau; Patricia V Elizalde
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of the progesterone receptor.

Authors:  A Guiochon-Mantel; P Lescop; S Christin-Maitre; H Loosfelt; M Perrot-Applanat; E Milgrom
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Cell-specific inhibitory and stimulatory effects of Fos and Jun on transcription activation by nuclear receptors.

Authors:  L Shemshedini; R Knauthe; P Sassone-Corsi; A Pornon; H Gronemeyer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.598

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.