Literature DB >> 3687683

Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by means of exercise two-dimensional echocardiography.

T Ryan1, W F Armstrong, J A O'Donnell, H Feigenbaum.   

Abstract

To determine whether exercise two-dimensional echocardiography contributes to the prognostic information provided by exercise testing in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction, 40 patients were prospectively studied by means of pre- and postexercise echocardiography 10 to 21 days after myocardial infarction. Patients were followed for 6 to 10 months or until one of the following clinical end points occurred: death, recurrent myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or coronary artery bypass grafting. Results of treadmill exercise tests were negative in 13 of 20 patients with good clinical outcome (65% specificity) and positive in 11 of 20 patients with poor clinical outcome (55% sensitivity). The resting echocardiogram was abnormal in 37 of 40 patients. The exercise echocardiogram was negative in 19 of 20 patients with good clinical outcome (95% specificity) and positive in 16 of 20 patients with poor clinical outcome (80% sensitivity). We conclude that exercise echocardiography is more sensitive and specific than treadmill exercise testing for predicting the occurrence of subsequent cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3687683     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(87)90530-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  13 in total

1.  Post-myocardial infarction risk stratification with stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography: separate but not equal.

Authors:  K A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  The role of stress echocardiography versus stress perfusion: a view from the other side.

Authors:  F A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Stress echocardiography for assessing myocardial ischaemia and viable myocardium.

Authors:  R Senior; A Kenny; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Stress testing. Directions for the future.

Authors:  C Foster
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Comparison of approaches in the assessment of myocardial viability and follow-up of PTCA/CABG. The role of echocardiography.

Authors:  L A Piérard
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993

7.  Stress echocardiography: time for critical reappraisal.

Authors:  P K Mazeika; P Nihoyannopoulos; C M Oakley
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

8.  Incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography as an adjunct to exercise electrocardiography after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Bigi; A Desideri; A Galati; J J Bax; C Coletta; C Fiorentini; P M Fioretti
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  A consideration of current clinical options for stress imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  E H Botvinick
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging detects more residual ischemia than stress echocardiography following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Kenneth B Harris; Michele Nanna; V S Srinivas; Alexander Del Vecchio; Garet M Gordon; Macduff Sheehy; David G DiMattia; Kimberly D Weltman; Mark I Travin
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.