Literature DB >> 3687498

A prospective study of the importance of psychological and social factors for the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time.

L V Sørensen1, O Mors, O Skovlund.   

Abstract

57 patients who underwent surgery for slipped lumbar disc for the first time were examined prospectively 6 months after surgery for the purpose of deciding the correlation between the outcome of surgery and social and psychological factors. The following factors were found to be of importance: Female sex, action for damages, prolonged disease of the back; prolonged, current attack, report of long-term illness, pathological pain producing, anxiety, depression and multiple somatic complaints revealed by Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory (MMPI), severe pain reported immediately post-operatively, employment and the presence of complete herniation at surgery. A closer study revealed 3 factors which were important independently and which explained the other factors: Admission of symptom scale (Ad) in the MMPI, the duration of the current attack and whether the patient was employed. On this basis we define a group with severe psychological and social strain (PASS), 57% of which had a poor outcome. 5% of the rest of the patients had a poor outcome. With the pre-operative assessment of whether or not the patients are under severe psychological and social strain, the outcome of surgery could be predicted correctly in 86% of the patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3687498     DOI: 10.1007/bf01404148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  14 in total

1.  Predictive value of radiculography in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part II).

Authors:  J O Espersen; M Kosteljanetz; H Halaburt; T Miletic
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  The effect of coping strategies on the relief of pain following surgical intervention for lower back pain.

Authors:  A R Gross
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  A critique of the surgical management of lumbar disc disease in a private neurosurgical practice.

Authors:  B L Rish
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale.

Authors:  Anna Maria Carlsson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  New development in panic--fear research in asthma: validity and stability of the MMPI panic--fear scale.

Authors:  J F Dirks; R A Kinsman; N F Jones; K H Fross
Journal:  Br J Med Psychol       Date:  1978-06

6.  The development of an MMPI alexithymia scale.

Authors:  J H Kleiger; R A Kinsman
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 17.659

7.  The Social Readjustment Rating Scale.

Authors:  T H Holmes; R H Rahe
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.006

8.  Predicting patients' perceptions of response to treatment for low-back pain.

Authors:  W P Taylor; W R Stern; T W Kubiszyn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Changes in MMPI profiles after low-back surgery.

Authors:  L D Herron; H C Pheasant
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Intervertebral disc surgery: strategies for patient selection to improve surgical outcome.

Authors:  C J Long; D A Brown; J Engelberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of bio-psychosocial risk factors for an unfavourable outcome after lumbar disc surgery.

Authors:  Jasper J den Boer; Rob A B Oostendorp; Tjemme Beems; Marten Munneke; Margreet Oerlemans; Andrea W M Evers
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Two-years' follow-up after lumbar disc surgery.].

Authors:  A Junge; M Fröhlich; S Ahrens; M Hasenbring; D Grob; J Dvorak
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Psychological vulnerability as a predictor for short-term outcome in lumbar spine surgery. A prospective study (Part II).

Authors:  P Thorvaldsen; E B Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Short-term outcome in lumbar spine surgery. A prospective study (Part I).

Authors:  P Thorvaldsen; E B Sørensen
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  A two-year prospective follow-up study of the outcome after surgery in patients with slipped lumbar disk operated upon for the first time.

Authors:  L V Sørensen; O Mors
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  [Predicting the outcome of diskectomy.].

Authors:  C Herda; T Wirth; H D Basler; I Florin; P Griss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  [Development of a screening questionnaire to predict good and poor outcome of lumbar disc surgery.].

Authors:  A Junge; S Ahrens; J Dvorak
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Does duration of preoperative sciatica impact surgical outcomes in patients with lumbar disc herniation?

Authors:  Farzad Omidi-Kashani; Ebrahim Ghayem Hasankhani; Amir Reza Kachooei; Mohammad Dawood Rahimi; Reza Khanzadeh
Journal:  Neurol Res Int       Date:  2014-01-28

9.  Effect of Social Support and Marital Status on Perceived Surgical Effectiveness and 30-Day Hospital Readmission.

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Victoria D Vuong; Ankit I Mehta; Raul A Vasquez; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-04-06

10.  Health-related quality of life of patients following selected types of lumbar spinal surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Karen L Saban; Sue M Penckofer; Ida Androwich; Fred B Bryant
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.