Literature DB >> 3681652

Social networks: we get by with (and in spite of) a little help from our friends.

M D Pagel1, W W Erdly, J Becker.   

Abstract

Studies of social support networks have almost exclusively measured only their positive aspects. In this research, we investigated both the helpful or positive and the upsetting or negative aspects of social networks in a longitudinal study of spouses caring for a husband or wife with Alzheimer's disease, a progressive senile dementia. Measures of helpful and upsetting aspects of the care givers' networks, derived from interviews and daily interaction ratings, were studied for their relations with overall network satisfaction and depression at an initial interview period (n = 68) and at a follow-up period about 10 months later (n = 38). Results from hierarchical multiple regression analyses, in which care givers' age and sex and a measure of the spouses' health status were controlled, showed that the care givers' degree of upset with their networks was strongly associated with lower network satisfaction and increased depression at both time periods. Helpful aspects bore little or no direct relation to either depression or network satisfaction. Helpful aspects of the network did, however, interact with network upset in predicting network satisfaction, and depression (combined probabilities test, p less than .05). Longitudinal predictions of follow-up depression, after age, sex, care givers' health status, and initial depression levels were controlled, showed that changes in upsetting aspects of one's network were predictive of changes in depression over time. We interpreted these results within an attributional framework that emphasizes the salience of upsetting events within a social network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3681652     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.4.793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  37 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in the social networks of young and older adults: prediction of mental health and cardiovascular reactivity during acute stress.

Authors:  B N Uchino; J Holt-Lunstad; D Uno; J B Flinders
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2001-08

Review 2.  A review of social isolation: an important but underassessed condition in older adults.

Authors:  Nicholas R Nicholson
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2012-06

3.  Provider and recipient factors that may moderate the effectiveness of received support: examining the effects of relationship quality and expectations for support on behavioral and cardiovascular reactions.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06-22

4.  Social Support, Negative Social Interactions, and Psychological Well-Being.

Authors:  Karen D Lincoln
Journal:  Soc Serv Rev       Date:  2000-06-01

5.  Stress-buffering or stress-exacerbation? Social support and social undermining as moderators of the relationship between perceived stress and depressive symptoms among married people.

Authors:  James A Cranford
Journal:  Pers Relatsh       Date:  2004-03

6.  Adapting the structural family systems rating to assess the patterns of interaction in families of dementia caregivers.

Authors:  Victoria B Mitrani; Daniel J Feaster; Brian E McCabe; Sara J Czaja; Jose Szapocznik
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2005-08

7.  [When hardship strikes welfare recipients. On who can they rely?].

Authors:  Michel Tousignant; Jean Caron
Journal:  Sante Ment Que       Date:  2005

8.  Couples coping with cancer: Research issues and recent findings.

Authors:  S Manne
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  1994-12

9.  The relationship between social support and psychological distress among Hispanic elders in Miami, Florida.

Authors:  Maria-Cristina Cruza-Guet; Arnold R Spokane; Grace I L Caskie; Scott C Brown; José Szapocznik
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2008-10

10.  Negative interaction in late life: issues in the stability and generalizability of conflict across relationships.

Authors:  Neal Krause; Karen S Rook
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.