Literature DB >> 3681378

Sequential cisplatin/VM-26 and vincristine/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin in metastatic neuroblastoma: an effective alternating non-cross-resistant regimen?

J L Bernard1, T Philip, J M Zucker, D Frappaz, A Robert, G Margueritte, A Boilletot, N Philippe, P Lutz, H Roche.   

Abstract

We report the results of a French multicentric pilot study of remission induction therapy in metastatic neuroblastoma. Thirty-five successive unselected patients entered the study over 1 year and were treated by alternating sequences of cisplatin/VM-26 (PE) and vincristine/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin (CADO). Three courses of each sequence were delivered. Disease reevaluation was extensive, with special focus on bone marrow status. Using strict criteria, 24 patients (68%) achieved a good partial response (GPR), which comprised normalization of bone marrow, and ten (28%) achieved a partial response (PR), and one progressed. The overall response rate was 96%. Thirty-two patients underwent surgery, and complete macroscopic removal of the primary was achieved in 21 (65%). After completion of induction and surgery, six patients (17%) were in complete remission (CRm), without evidence of any residual disease; nine (26%) were in very good partial remission (VGPRm; same as CRm except persistence of nonpathologically evaluable improved bone scan), and 19 (51%) were in partial remission (PRm). Toxicity was acceptable, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. These results show no substantial improvement compared with those previously reported with similar but nonalternating regimens. We advocate a two-category concept (response, remission) to describe initial therapy results in metastatic neuroblastoma and emphasize the need to assess bone marrow by an extensive evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3681378     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.12.1952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  6 in total

1.  Clinico-epidemiology of neuroblastoma in north east Egypt: A 5-year multicenter study.

Authors:  Youssef Al-Tonbary; Mohamed Badr; Ahmed Mansour; Usama El Safy; Shebl Saeed; Tamer Hassan; Rasha Elashery; Rofida Nofal; Ahmad Darwish
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  Epipodophyllotoxins in the treatment of childhood cancer.

Authors:  G K Rivera; C H Pui; V M Santana; C B Pratt; W M Crist
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Short duration, high dose, alternating chemotherapy in metastatic neuroblastoma. (ENSG 3C induction regimen). The European Neuroblastoma Study Group.

Authors:  C R Pinkerton; J M Zucker; O Hartmann; J Pritchard; V Broadbent; P Morris-Jones; F Breatnach; A E Craft; A D Pearson; K R Wallendszus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  The small molecule inhibitor YK-4-279 disrupts mitotic progression of neuroblastoma cells, overcomes drug resistance and synergizes with inhibitors of mitosis.

Authors:  Madhu Kollareddy; Alice Sherrard; Ji Hyun Park; Marianna Szemes; Kelli Gallacher; Zsombor Melegh; Sebastian Oltean; Martin Michaelis; Jindrich Cinatl; Abderrahmane Kaidi; Karim Malik
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Double megatherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced neuroblastoma: the LMCE2 study.

Authors:  T Philip; R Ladenstein; J M Zucker; R Pinkerton; E Bouffet; D Louis; W Siegert; J L Bernard; D Frappaz; C Coze
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Refractory Stage M Ganglioneuroblastoma With Bone Metastases and a Favorable, Chronic Course of Disease: Description of a Patient Cohort.

Authors:  Michelle L Tas; Jan J Molenaar; Annemarie M L Peek; Maarten H Lequin; Rob M Verdijk; Ronald R de Krijger; Godelieve A M Tytgat; Max M van Noesel
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 1.289

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.