Literature DB >> 3680337

The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement. A fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period.

T W Phillips1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish if the Bateman prosthesis functions as a bipolar device moving primarily at the inner metal-on-polyethylene bearing as originally proposed, or as a unipolar hemiarthroplasty moving at the outer metal-on-cartilage surface as has recently been suggested. One hundred hips were examined at one year follow-up; 78 were examined again at two to four years. The replacement was performed for arthritis in 76 hips and for femoral neck fracture in 24. Movement was assessed both with and without weight-bearing. In 80% of the arthritis group the prosthesis functioned as a bipolar hip replacement with movement occurring primarily at the inner metal-on-polyethylene surface. By contrast, in 75% of the fracture group the prosthesis functioned largely as a unipolar device with movement occurring primarily at the outer metal-on-cartilage surface. In all cases examined serially the movement pattern was the same at two to four years as it has been at one year. Clearly, the action of the prosthesis depends on the condition of the acetabular cartilage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3680337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  20 in total

1.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Carl-Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Sari Ponzer; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Thermal Inactivation of Aeromonas hydrophila As Affected by Sodium Chloride and Ascorbic Acid.

Authors:  M L Stecchini; I Sarais; A Giomo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  Carl Johan Hedbeck; Richard Blomfeldt; Gunilla Lapidus; Hans Törnkvist; Sari Ponzer; Jan Tidermark
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Bipolar versus monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femur neck fractures: a meta-analysis study.

Authors:  Migliorini Filippo; Arne Driessen; Giorgia Colarossi; Valentin Quack; Markus Tingart; Jörg Eschweiler
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-26

5.  Treatment of femoral neck fractures in elderly patients over 60 years of age - which is the ideal modality of primary joint replacement?

Authors:  Christian Ossendorf; Max J Scheyerer; Guido A Wanner; Hans-Peter Simmen; Clément Ml Werner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-10-20

6.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of the arthroplasty options for displaced femoral neck fractures in the active, healthy, elderly population.

Authors:  James Slover; Michael V Hoffman; Henrik Malchau; Anna N A Tosteson; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  R Malhotra; R Arya; S Bhan
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Bipolar or unipolar hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture in the geriatric population.

Authors:  Egemen Ayhan; Hayrettin Kesmezacar; Ozgür Karaman; Adem Sahin; Nail Kır
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

9.  Cemented unipolar or modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients - which is better?

Authors:  Abdul Q Khan; Julfiqar Mohammad; Rayed Qamar; Yasir S Siddiqui; Aamir B Sabir; Mazhar Abbas
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 10.  Fractures in the elderly: when is hip replacement a necessity?

Authors:  Prasad Antapur; Nizar Mahomed; Rajiv Gandhi
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.