Literature DB >> 367775

Testing the environment for dispersed mutagens: use of plant bioconcentrators coupled with microbial mutagen assays.

W S Barnes, E J Klekowski.   

Abstract

Mutagens dispersed in ecosystems are usually in low concentration and episodic in occurrence. The possibility of detecting such dispersed mutagens by utilizing indigenous bioconcentrator organisms coupled with a microbial mutagen assay offer a useful screening protocol. There are numerous examples of plant and animal species which concentrate toxic substances from the environment. Body extracts of these bioconcentrators can be suitably fractioned and tested for mutagens with various microbial mutagen assays. The fractions may be tested with a broad range of microbial assays covering numerous genetic end points as well as both with and without mammalian microsomal activation. This kind of environmental screening has an advantage over physicochemical techniques, in that sampling techniques are simpler and a wider chemical spectrum can be screened. There are problems inherent with testing a complex biological extract, however. If a reversion assay is used, the metabolite necessary for growth may be present. Toxins may be introduced, either concentrated from the environment in the same way as the mutagen, or produced by the concentrator itself. Finally, the concentrator may also produce an endogenous mutagen which will give spuriously active extracts. Methods for minimizing some of these difficulties are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 367775      PMCID: PMC1637316          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.782761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  35 in total

1.  Molecular and genetic basis of furocoumarin reactions.

Authors:  B R Scott; M A Pathak; G R Mohn
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  CARCINOGENIC PROPERTIES OF NUTS FROM CYCAS CIRCINALIS L. INDIGENOUS TO GUAM.

Authors:  G L LAQUEUR; O MICKELSEN; M G WHITING; L T KURLAND
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Monitoring the marine environment for mutagens.

Authors:  J M Parry; D J Tweats; M A Al-Mossawi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Mutagenicities of quinoline and its derivatives.

Authors:  M Nagao; T Yahagi; Y Seino; T Sugimura; N Ito
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.433

5.  Detection of mutagenic activity in particulate air pollutants.

Authors:  H Tokiwa; K Morita; H Takeyoshi; K Takahashi; Y Ohnishi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Mutagenic activity of quercetin and related compounds.

Authors:  L F Bjeldanes; G W Chang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Oncogenic and tumor-promoting Spermatophytes and Pteridophytes and their active principles.

Authors:  N R Farnsworth; A S Bingel; H H Fong; A A Saleh; G M Christenson; S M Saufferer
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1976-08

8.  Concentration of mutagens from urine by absorption with the nonpolar resin XAD-2: cigarette smokers have mutagenic urine.

Authors:  E Yamasaki; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Environmental pollutants and the epidemiology of cancer.

Authors:  C W Heath
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Exploratory monitoring of air pollutants for mutagenicity activity with the Tradescantia stamen hair system.

Authors:  L A Schairer; J Van't Hof; C G Hayes; R M Burton; F J de Serres
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.