Literature DB >> 367768

Potential of plant genetic systems for monitoring and screening mutagens.

R A Nilan.   

Abstract

Plants have too long been ignored as useful screening and monitoring systems of environmental mutagens. However, there are about a dozen reliable, some even unique, plant genetic systems that can increase the scope and effectiveness of chemical and physical mutagen screening and monitoring procedures. Some of these should be included in the Tier II tests. Moreover, plants are the only systems now in use as monitors of genetic effects caused by polluted atmosphere and water and by pesticides. There are several major advantages of the plant test systems which relate to their reproductive nature, easy culture and growth habits that should be considered in mutagen screening and monitoring. In addition to these advantages, the major plant test systems exhibit numerous genetic and chromosome changes for determining the effects of mutagens. Some of these have not yet been detected in other nonmammalian and mammalian test systems, but probably occur in the human organism. Plants have played major roles in various aspects of mutagenesis research, primarily in mutagen screening (detection and verification of mutagenic activity), mutagen monitoring, and determining mutagen effects and mechanisms of mutagen action. They have played lesser roles in quantification of mutagenic activity and understanding the nature of induced mutations.Mutagen monitoring with plants, especially in situ on land or in water, will help determine potential genetic hazards of air and water pollutants and protect the genetic purity of crop plants and the purity of the food supply. The Tradescantia stamen-hair system is used in a mobile laboratory for determining the genetic effects of industrial and automobile pollution in a number of sites in the U.S.A. The fern is employed for monitoring genetic effects of water pollution in the Eastern states. The maize pollen system and certain weeds have monitored genetic effects of pesticides. Several other systems that have considerable value and should be developed and more widely used in mutagen monitoring and screening, especially for in situ monitoring, are discussed. Emphasis is placed on pollen systems in which changes in pollen structure, chemistry, and chromosomes can be scored for monitoring; and screening systems which can record low levels of genetic effects as well as provide information on the nature of induced mutations. THE VALUE OF PLANT SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING AND SCREENING MUTAGENS CAN BE IMPROVED BY: greater knowledge of plant cell processes at the molecular and ultrastructural levels; relating these processes to mutagen effects and plant cell responses; improving current systems for increased sensitivity, ease of detecting genetic and chromosome changes, recording of data (including automation), and for extending the range of genetic and chromosome end points; and designing and developing new systems with the aid of previous and current botanical and genetic knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 367768      PMCID: PMC1637287          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7827181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  37 in total

Review 1.  Environmental mutagenic hazards.

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-02-14       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Interspecific comparison of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation rates in relation to genome size.

Authors:  A P Schalet
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Some problems associated with the testing for environmental mutagens and a perspective for studies in "comparative mutagenesis".

Authors:  F H Sobels
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 4.  Metabolism of insecticides and herbicides in higher plants.

Authors:  J J Menn; G G Still
Journal:  CRC Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1977-05

5.  Approaches to determining the mutagenic properties of chemicals: risk to future generations.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1977 Nov-Dec

6.  Genetic toxicology of mitomycin C, actinomycins, daunomycin and adriamycin.

Authors:  B K Vig
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 7.  Utility of specific locus systems in higher plants to monitor for mutagens.

Authors:  M J Constantin
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Self-incompatibility systems as bioassays for mutagens.

Authors:  D L Mulcahy; C M Johnson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Somatic mosaicism in plants with special reference to somatic crossing over.

Authors:  B K Vig
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Bioaccumulation and detection of trace levels of cadmium in aquatic systems by Eichhornia crassipes.

Authors:  B C Wolverton; R C McDonald
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pollen genetic markers for detection of mutagens in the environment.

Authors:  R A Nilan; J L Rosichan; P Arenaz; A L Hodgdon; A Kleinhofs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Germinal cell mutagenesis in specially designed maize genotypes.

Authors:  M J Plewa; E D Wagner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.