Literature DB >> 3677284

The relationship between central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during aortic surgery.

D M Ansley1, J G Ramsay, D G Whalley, J M Bent, R Lisbona, V Derbekyan, J E Wynands.   

Abstract

Twenty-three ASA physical status II-III patients scheduled for elective abdominal aortic surgery were studied preoperatively with multiple unit gated acquisition angiography (MUGA) scan to determine the resting left ventricular and right ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF and RVEF respectively). Intraoperatively pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and central venous pressure (CVP) were measured in each patient at five different time periods in the horizontal, 24 degrees head up, and 24 degrees head down table tilt positions. The correlation between absolute values and changes in PCWP and CVP, and the degree to which preoperative knowledge of LVEF and RVEF predicted these correlations were examined. Resting LVEF ranged from 0.1 to 0.84. Thirteen of the 23 patients failed to show significant correlation (p less than 0.05) between the absolute values of PCWP and CVP either before and/or after aortic crossclamp. When the correlation coefficients from this analysis were ranked against LVEF, there was a weak but significant correlation before aortic crossclamp (r = 0.41), but not after. The correlation between a change in PCWP and a change in CVP was significant for the 23 patients at all time intervals, before and after aortic crossclamp. However, the prediction of a change of PCWP value from a known change of CVP value ranged in accuracy from +/- 3 mmHg to +/- 12.5 mmHg. The study suggests that if the filling pressures of both ventricles need to be assessed during aortic surgery, then the PCWP and CVP must be independently measured.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3677284     DOI: 10.1007/BF03010518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

1.  Filling pressures in the right and left sides of the heart in acute myocardial infarction. A reappraisal of central-venous-pressure monitoring.

Authors:  J S Forrester; G Diamond; T J McHugh; H J Swan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-07-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Central venous pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure as the determinant of fluid replacement in aortic surgery.

Authors:  C L Rice; C F Hobelman; D A John; D E Smith; J D Malley; B F Cammack; D R James; R M Peters; R W Virgilio
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  To (PA) catheterize or not to (PA) catheterize--that is the question.

Authors:  E Lowenstein; R Teplick
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  The radionuclide ejection fraction: a comparison of three radionuclide techniques with contrast angiography.

Authors:  E D Folland; G W Hamilton; S M Larson; J W Kennedy; D L Williams; J L Ritchie
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Studies in clinical shock and hypotension: VI. Relationship between left and right ventricular function.

Authors:  J N Cohn; F E Tristani; I M Khatri
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Myocardial ischemia due to infrarenal aortic cross-clamping during aortic surgery in patients with severe coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R R Attia; J D Murphy; M Snider; D G Lappas; R C Darling; E Lowenstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The value of nuclear angiography in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing elective aortic surgery.

Authors:  W N Gallacher; J Goldberg; P Houston; M Druck; S Dunington
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1984-09

8.  Monitoring pulmonary arterial pressure in coronary-artery disease.

Authors:  D T Mangano
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 7.892

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Dipyridamole-thallium myocardial scanning in the preoperative assessment of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy.

Authors:  R P Grant; C Morgan; M S Page; D N Malm; V Huckel; L C Jenkins
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

2.  Abstracts: annual meeting of the Canadian Anesthetists' Society. June 26-29, 1988, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 3.  Anaesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery--a review (Part II).

Authors:  A J Cunningham
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.063

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.