Literature DB >> 3674795

Effects of oral physostigmine in Alzheimer's disease.

Y Stern1, M Sano, R Mayeux.   

Abstract

Previous studies of oral physostigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease have: (1) assumed physostigmine is effective only in mildly affected patients; (2) relied on an initial "dose-finding" phase to determine the most effective dose and excluded nonresponders; and (3) primarily assessed memory. We examined the response of 22 patients to six different daily dosages of oral physostigmine, using selective reminding tests that were administered twice daily. Nine patients had a "best" dose/day (mode = 13 mg/day), which was used in a subsequent double-blind crossover study. The other 13 were given the highest tolerated dose. The selective reminding test and a full neuropsychological battery were given during the drug and placebo periods. As a group, the 22 patients improved significantly on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Digit Symbol subtest and a shape cancellation task (p less than 0.05). Nine patients showed improved performance on the selective reminding test during physostigmine treatment, and 9 showed no response; 4 patients performed better during placebo treatment. Dose finding did not help in predicting response in the crossover study; only 2 of the 9 who showed improvement had a best dose. Dementia severity did not predict crossover response. This suggests that: (1) physostigmine as administered had no pronounced effect on memory in Alzheimer's disease; (2) oral physostigmine produces no greater benefits on memory in mildly than in moderately demented patients; (3) response in a dose-finding phase does not predict response in double-blind crossover; and (4) Digit Symbol and cancellation tasks may be more sensitive than memory tests to the effects of oral physostigmine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3674795     DOI: 10.1002/ana.410220305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  9 in total

1.  Tacrine for Alzheimer's disease. Costs and benefits.

Authors:  D Knopman
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 1. Screening for cognitive impairment in the elderly. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Activating the damaged basal forebrain cholinergic system: tonic stimulation versus signal amplification.

Authors:  M Sarter; J P Bruno; P Dudchenko
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Physostigmine for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  F Coelho; J Birks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

5.  Cholinergic treatment of an amnestic man with a basal forebrain lesion: theoretical implications.

Authors:  A Chatterjee; M K Morris; D Bowers; D J Williamson; L Doty; K M Heilman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Chronic treatments with cholinoceptor drugs influence spatial learning in rats.

Authors:  F A Abdulla; M R Calaminici; J D Stephenson; J D Sinden
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Hormesis and medicine.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Diagnostic and pharmacological approaches in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  C Hermann; R G Stern; M F Losonzcy; S Jaff; M Davidson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  Advances in the pharmacotherapy of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J C Soares; S Gershon
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.270

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.